1418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12851351)
1. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study.
Smith SW; Estok DM; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Nov; 80(11):1632-40. PubMed ID: 9840632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survivorship of femoral revision hip arthroplasty in patients with osteonecrosis.
Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Khanuja HS; Pietryak BP; Jones LC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():126-30. PubMed ID: 17079378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.
Callaghan JJ; Albright JC; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10761939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years.
Haydon CM; Mehin R; Burnett S; Rorabeck CH; Bourne RB; McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jun; 86(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 15173290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.
Weber M; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Sep; 80(9):1295-305. PubMed ID: 9759814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum ten-year follow-up of cemented total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Fyda TM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak J; Johnston RC
Iowa Orthop J; 2002; 22():8-19. PubMed ID: 12180617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impaction allografting with cement for revision of the femoral component. A minimum four-year follow-up study with use of a precoated femoral stem.
Leopold SS; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Aug; 81(8):1080-92. PubMed ID: 10466641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Whaley AL; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Sep; 83(9):1352-7. PubMed ID: 11568198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study.
Mulroy WF; Estok DM; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Dec; 77(12):1845-52. PubMed ID: 8550652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study.
Okuzu Y; Goto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Nov; 21(6):810-814. PubMed ID: 27553266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
