173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12851534)
1. Potential dosing errors using portable prothrombin time monitoring devices.
Loebstein R; Kurnik D; Lubetsky A; Ezra D; Halkin H
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2003 Jul; 14(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 12851534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.
Wieloch M; Hillarp A; Strandberg K; Nilsson C; Svensson PJ
Thromb Res; 2009 Jul; 124(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19423152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and precision of the CoaguChek S versus laboratory INRs in a clinic.
Havrda DE; Hawk TL; Marvin CM
Ann Pharmacother; 2002 May; 36(5):769-75. PubMed ID: 11978150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparative Study of Point-of-Care Prothrombin Time in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery.
Okabayashi S; Ogawa S; Tanaka KA; Nishiyama T; Takeshita S; Nakayama Y; Nakajima Y; Sawa T; Mizobe T
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Aug; 32(4):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 29395816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of international normalized ratio determined by portable venous-blood coagulation monitor versus a central laboratory.
Sirithunyanont C; Bhuripanyo K; Kangkagate C; Winyarat W; Srichaya P; Wangtip K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86 Suppl 1():S67-75. PubMed ID: 12866771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of a portable International Normalization Ratio monitor in outpatients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy: comparison with a laboratory reference standard using clinically relevant criteria for agreement.
Douketis JD; Lane A; Milne J; Ginsberg JS
Thromb Res; 1998 Oct; 92(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 9783669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the CoaguChek S and XS Point of Care devices when starting warfarin in a hospital outreach setting.
Sobieraj-Teague M; Daniel D; Farrelly B; Coghlan D; Gallus A
Thromb Res; 2009 Apr; 123(6):909-13. PubMed ID: 19042011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of home prothrombin international ratio (PT-INR) management in children with mechanical prosthetic valves - Importance of individual correlations between laboratory and CoaguChek device PT-INRs.
Ino N; Masutani S; Tanikawa S; Iwamoto Y; Saiki H; Ishido H; Tamura M; Senzaki H
J Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 71(2):187-191. PubMed ID: 29066099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Importance of device evaluation for point-of-care prothrombin time international normalized ratio testing programs.
McBane RD; Felty CL; Hartgers ML; Chaudhry R; Beyer LK; Santrach PJ
Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Feb; 80(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15704772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity of CoaguChek S for home monitoring of anticoagulant therapy in pediatrics.
Hill J; Perreault S; Dorval M
Can J Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 23(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17245482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of CoaguChek XS for measuring prothrombin time in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant therapy].
Lee JH; Lee KS; Kim DS; Lee HS; Choi SI; Cho YG
Korean J Lab Med; 2007 Jun; 27(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 18094572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and clinical utility of the CoaguChek XS portable international normalised ratio monitor in a pilot study of warfarin home-monitoring.
Bereznicki LR; Jackson SL; Peterson GM; Jeffrey EC; Marsden KA; Jupe DM
J Clin Pathol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):311-4. PubMed ID: 16751303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
Bauman ME; Black KL; Massicotte MP; Bauman ML; Kuhle S; Howlett-Clyne S; Cembrowski GS; Bajzar L
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jun; 99(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 18521514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of International Normalized Ratios provided by two point-of-care devices and laboratory-based venipuncture in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.
Donaldson M; Sullivan J; Norbeck A
Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2010 Oct; 67(19):1616-22. PubMed ID: 20852163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between CoaguChek S- and Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
Jonsson M; Hillarp A; Svensson P
Thromb Res; 2004; 114(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15306149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a point-of-care device in determining prothrombin time in an anticoagulation clinic.
Colella MP; Fiusa MM; Orsi FL; de Paula EV; Annichino-Bizzacchi JM
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis; 2012 Mar; 23(2):172-4. PubMed ID: 22246165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of international normalized ratio measurement between CoaguChek XS Plus and STA-R coagulation analyzers.
Hur M; Kim H; Park CM; La Gioia A; Choi SG; Choi JH; Moon HW; Yun YM
Biomed Res Int; 2013; 2013():213109. PubMed ID: 23509691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical significance of differences between point-of-care and laboratory INR methods in over-anticoagulated patients.
Lawrie AS; Hills J; Longair I; Green L; Gardiner C; Machin SJ; Cohen H
Thromb Res; 2012 Jul; 130(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 21937093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the international normalized ratio levels obtained by portable coagulometer and laboratory in a clinic specializing in oral anticoagulation.
Meneghelo ZM; Barroso CM; Liporace IL; Cora AP
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Aug; 37(4):536-43. PubMed ID: 25754527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]