173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12851534)
21. Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy.
Kalçık M; Yesin M; Gürsoy MO; Gündüz S; Karakoyun S; Astarcıoğlu MA; Bayam E; Cerşit S; Özkan M
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2017 Mar; 23(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 26177662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Whole blood international normalization ratio measurements in children using near-patient monitors.
Nowatzke WL; Landt M; Smith C; Wilhite T; Canter C; Luchtman-Jones L
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2003 Jan; 25(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 12544771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Comparison of Quick/INR values of whole capillary blood (CoaguChek Plus) and venous citrate plasma in patients with and without oral anticoagulation].
Burri S; Demarmels Biasiutti F; Lämmle B; Wuillemin WA
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1998 Oct; 128(44):1723-9. PubMed ID: 9846345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. INR comparison between the CoaguChek S and a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation.
Hentrich DP; Fritschi J; Müller PR; Wuillemin WA
Thromb Res; 2007; 119(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 16765423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children.
Paioni P; Kroiss S; Kägi E; Bergsträsser E; Fasnacht M; Bauersfeld U; Schmugge M; Albisetti M
Acta Haematol; 2009; 122(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19816011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Evaluation of Portable Coagulation Analyzer in Comparison with Conventional Hospital Laboratory Instrument with Stratification of International Normalized Ratios by Therapeutic Upper Limit].
Sasaki K; Sato K; Suzuki M; Kumagai K; Adachi O; Saiki Y
Kyobu Geka; 2016 May; 69(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 27220921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy, reproducibility and clinical utility of the CoaguChek S portable international normalized ratio monitor in an outpatient anticoagulation clinic.
Jackson SL; Bereznicki LR; Peterson GM; Marsden KA; Jupe DM; Tegg E; Vial JH; Kimber RI
Clin Lab Haematol; 2004 Feb; 26(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 14738438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of laboratory and portable monitor international normalized ratio determinations. Comparison with a criterion standard.
Kaatz SS; White RH; Hill J; Mascha E; Humphries JE; Becker DM
Arch Intern Med; 1995 Sep; 155(17):1861-7. PubMed ID: 7677552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A national field study of quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors.
Meijer P; Kluft C; Poller L; van der Meer FJ; Keown M; Ibrahim S; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Jespersen J
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):756-61. PubMed ID: 17050073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative study of a portable system for prothrombin monitoring using capillary blood against venous blood measurements in patients using oral anticoagulants: correlation and concordance.
Leiria TL; Pellanda LC; Magalhães E; Lima GG
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 89(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17768575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.
Braun S; Watzke H; Hasenkam JM; Schwab M; Wolf T; Dovifat C; Völler H
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17264962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of point of care coagulometers compared to reference laboratory measurements in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy.
Dillinger JG; Si Moussi T; Berge N; Bal Dit Sollier C; Henry P; Drouet L
Thromb Res; 2016 Apr; 140():66-72. PubMed ID: 26901852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability, validity and ease of use of a portable point-of-care coagulation device in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.
Lizotte A; Quessy I; Vanier MC; Martineau J; Caron S; Darveau M; Dubé A; Gilbert E; Blais N; Lalonde L
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2002 Dec; 14(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 12913406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison between international normalized ratio using a portable device and conventional methodology.
De Piano LP; Strunz CM; Mansur Ade P; Rached RA
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2007 Jan; 88(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 17364115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analytical performance of the new coagulation monitoring system INRatio for the determination of INR compared with the coagulation monitor Coaguchek S and an established laboratory method.
Taborski U; Braun SL; Völler H
J Thromb Thrombolysis; 2004 Oct; 18(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15789176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. INR comparison between the CoaguChek Pro PT(N) and a standard laboratory method.
Khoschnewis S; Hannes FM; Tschopp M; Wuillemin WA
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 15183045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of patient capability to self-adjust oral anticoagulant dose: a multicenter study on home use of portable prothrombin time monitor (COAGUCHECK).
Cosmi B; Palareti G; Carpanedo M; Pengo V; Biasiolo A; Rampazzo P; Morstabilini G; Testa S
Haematologica; 2000 Aug; 85(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 10942929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative study of two portable systems for oral anticoagulant monitoring.
Vacas M; Lafuente PJ; Unanue I; Iriarte JA
Hematol J; 2004; 5(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 14745428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Suboptimal Anticoagulant Management in Japanese Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Warfarin for Stroke Prevention.
Hirano T; Kaneko H; Mishina S; Wang F; Morita S
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2102-2110. PubMed ID: 28532651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
