212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12852466)
1. The state of the art in the 1990's: NCRP Report No. 136 on the scientific bases for linearity in the dose-response relationship for ionizing radiation.
Upton AC;
Health Phys; 2003 Jul; 85(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 12852466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems and prospects.
Upton AC
In Vivo; 2002; 16(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 12494897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
Boice JD
Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental standards for ionizing radiation: theoretical basis for dose-response curves.
Upton AC
Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Oct; 52():31-9. PubMed ID: 6653536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Key studies used to support cancer risk assessment questioned.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2011 Oct; 52(8):595-606. PubMed ID: 21786337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A model of chromosome aberration induction and chronic myeloid leukaemia incidence at low doses.
Ballarini F; Ottolenghi A
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2004 Sep; 43(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 15309385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the origins of the linear no-threshold (LNT) dogma by means of untruths, artful dodges and blind faith.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():432-42. PubMed ID: 26248082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing a scientific basis for radiation risk estimates: goal of the DOE Low Dose Research Program.
Brooks AL
Health Phys; 2003 Jul; 85(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 12852475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.
Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Sep; 38(3):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 30004025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer risk assessment foundation unraveling: new historical evidence reveals that the US National Academy of Sciences (US NAS), Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation (BEAR) Committee Genetics Panel falsified the research record to promote acceptance of the LNT.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Apr; 89(4):649-50. PubMed ID: 25600588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How the US National Academy of Sciences misled the world community on cancer risk assessment: new findings challenge historical foundations of the linear dose response.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2013 Dec; 87(12):2063-81. PubMed ID: 23912675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-dose radiation exposure and carcinogenesis.
Suzuki K; Yamashita S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jul; 42(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 22641644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EPA adopts LNT: New historical perspectives.
Calabrese EJ
Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Aug; 308():110-112. PubMed ID: 31108044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation biology: concepts for radiation protection.
Preston RJ
Health Phys; 2005 Jun; 88(6):545-56. PubMed ID: 15891452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An abuse of risk assessment: how regulatory agencies improperly adopted LNT for cancer risk assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2015 Apr; 89(4):647-8. PubMed ID: 25596944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urgent Change Needed to Radiation Protection Policy.
Cuttler JM
Health Phys; 2016 Mar; 110(3):267-70. PubMed ID: 26808879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The LNT model is the best we can do--today.
Preston RJ
J Radiol Prot; 2003 Sep; 23(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 14582718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation-induced genomic instability: radiation quality and dose response.
Smith LE; Nagar S; Kim GJ; Morgan WF
Health Phys; 2003 Jul; 85(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12852467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
