212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12852466)
21. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
Doss M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The linear no-threshold model does not hold for low-dose ionizing radiation.
Hooker AM; Bhat M; Day TK; Lane JM; Swinburne SJ; Morley AA; Sykes PJ
Radiat Res; 2004 Oct; 162(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 15447037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
C R Acad Sci III; 1999; 322(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 10196673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Nonlinearity of radiation health effects.
Pollycove M
Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Feb; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):363-8. PubMed ID: 9539031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dose-effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the joint report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine.
Tubiana M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):317-9. PubMed ID: 16168825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
Breckow J
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods.
Léonard A; Rueff J; Gerber GB; Léonard ED
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):448-54. PubMed ID: 16381765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A review of the bystander effect and its implications for low-dose exposure.
Prise KM; Folkard M; Michael BD
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 14579891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative analysis of biological responses to ionizing radiation, including dose, irradiation time, and dose rate.
Magae J; Hoshi Y; Furukawa C; Kawakami Y; Ogata H
Radiat Res; 2003 Nov; 160(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 14565828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Recent Epidemiologic Studies and the Linear No-Threshold Model For Radiation Protection-Considerations Regarding NCRP Commentary 27.
Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):235-246. PubMed ID: 30585971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dose response relationships for acute ionizing-radiation lethality.
Anno GH; Young RW; Bloom RM; Mercier JR
Health Phys; 2003 May; 84(5):565-75. PubMed ID: 12747475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. NCRP Vision for the Future and Program Area Committee Activities in 2018.
Boice JD
Health Phys; 2019 Feb; 116(2):282-294. PubMed ID: 30585977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Relative implications of protective responses versus damage induction at low dose and low-dose-rate exposures, using the microdose approach.
Feinendegen LE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 104(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 14579890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predicting cancer rates in astronauts from animal carcinogenesis studies and cellular markers.
Williams JR; Zhang Y; Zhou H; Osman M; Cha D; Kavet R; Cuccinotta F; Dicello JF; Dillehay LE
Mutat Res; 1999 Dec; 430(2):255-69. PubMed ID: 10631340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Twenty five years of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine - progress and priorities for future of radiation medicine and biology.
Bazyka D
Probl Radiac Med Radiobiol; 2017 Dec; 22():10-14. PubMed ID: 29286493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Inferences, Risk Modeling, and Prediction of Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation.
Dainiak N
Health Phys; 2016 Mar; 110(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 26808880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
