BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12852535)

  • 1. Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2003 Jun; 30(6):1110-7. PubMed ID: 12852535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative evaluation of dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(12):2563-76. PubMed ID: 15272674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
    Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit.
    Brandan ME; Ramírez-R V
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(9):2307-20. PubMed ID: 16625044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
    Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Error analysis of calibration materials on dual-energy mammography.
    Mou X; Chen X
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2007; 10(Pt 2):596-603. PubMed ID: 18044617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: an experimental feasibility study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):793-801. PubMed ID: 20229889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A calibration approach to glandular tissue composition estimation in digital mammography.
    Kaufhold J; Thomas JA; Eberhard JW; Galbo CE; Trotter DE
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1867-80. PubMed ID: 12201434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microcalcification detection using cone-beam CT mammography with a flat-panel imager.
    Gong X; Vedula AA; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2183-95. PubMed ID: 15248571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.
    Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual-energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Lu KM; Yeh DM; Cao BH; Lin CY; Liang CY; Zhou YB; Tsai CJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):170-177. PubMed ID: 31106990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3-D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters using stereo imaging: algorithm and mammographic unit calibration.
    Daul C; Graebling P; Tiedeu A; Wolf D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2058-73. PubMed ID: 16366229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis.
    Lemacks MR; Kappadath SC; Shaw CC; Liu X; Whitman GJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1739-51. PubMed ID: 12201421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved microcalcification visualization using dual-energy digital mammography.
    Tsai CJ; Chen RC; Peng HL; Hsu WL; Lee JJ
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 23528569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of breast arterial calcification using full field digital mammography.
    Molloi S; Xu T; Ducote J; Iribarren C
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1428-39. PubMed ID: 18491538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study.
    Koukou V; Martini N; Michail C; Sotiropoulou P; Fountzoula C; Kalyvas N; Kandarakis I; Nikiforidis G; Fountos G
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():574238. PubMed ID: 26246848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
    Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.