565 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12852709)
1. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus placebo for controlling the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis and rhinoconjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Turner D
Clin Ther; 2003 Mar; 25(3):931-47. PubMed ID: 12852709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.
Spangler DL; Abelson MB; Ober A; Gotnes PJ
Clin Ther; 2003 Aug; 25(8):2245-67. PubMed ID: 14512132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and cromolyn sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.
Katelaris CH; Ciprandi G; Missotten L; Turner FD; Bertin D; Berdeaux G;
Clin Ther; 2002 Oct; 24(10):1561-75. PubMed ID: 12462286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and azelastine hydrochloride 0.05% ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Spangler DL; Bensch G; Berdy GJ
Clin Ther; 2001 Aug; 23(8):1272-80. PubMed ID: 11558863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.2% compared with placebo in patients with allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis: a randomized, double-masked environmental study.
Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Vogelson CT; Pasquine TA; Gross RD; Turner FD; Wells DT; Bergamini MV; Robertson SM
Clin Ther; 2004 Aug; 26(8):1237-48. PubMed ID: 15476905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ketotifen fumarate ophthalmic solution alone, desloratadine alone, and their combination for inhibition of the signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge model: a double-masked, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
Crampton HJ
Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):1975-87. PubMed ID: 12946545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in allergic conjunctivitis by conjunctival cedar pollen allergen challenge.
Fujishima H; Ohashi Y; Takamura E
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2014 Oct; 113(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 25163405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the efficacy of combined fluticasone propionate and olopatadine versus combined fluticasone propionate and fexofenadine for the treatment of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.
Lanier BQ; Abelson MB; Berger WE; Granet DB; D'Arienzo PA; Spangler DL; Kägi MK
Clin Ther; 2002 Jul; 24(7):1161-74. PubMed ID: 12182260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and tolerability of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and loteprednol etabonate 0.2% ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Berdy GJ; Stoppel JO; Epstein AB
Clin Ther; 2002 Jun; 24(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 12117082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution (0.1%) versus ketorolac ophthalmic solution (0.5%) using the provocative antigen challenge model.
Deschenes J; Discepola M; Abelson M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl; 1999; (228):47-52. PubMed ID: 10337433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the clinical efficacy of pheniramine maleate/naphazoline hydrochloride ophthalmic solution and olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Greiner JV; Udell IJ
Clin Ther; 2005 May; 27(5):568-77. PubMed ID: 15978305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and comfort of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1% ophthalmic solution and nedocromil sodium 2% ophthalmic solution in the human conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Butrus S; Greiner JV; Discepola M; Finegold I
Clin Ther; 2000 Dec; 22(12):1462-72. PubMed ID: 11192137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine vs epinastine ophthalmic solution in the conjunctival allergen challenge model.
Lanier BQ; Finegold I; D'Arienzo P; Granet D; Epstein AB; Ledgerwood GL
Curr Med Res Opin; 2004 Aug; 20(8):1227-33. PubMed ID: 15324525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the effects of ketotifen fumarate 0.025% and olopatadine HCl 0.1% ophthalmic solutions in seasonal allergic conjunctivities: a 30-day, randomized, double-masked, artificial tear substitute-controlled trial.
Avunduk AM; Tekelioglu Y; Turk A; Akyol N
Clin Ther; 2005 Sep; 27(9):1392-402. PubMed ID: 16291412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.2% in reducing signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Pasquine T; Edwards MR; Gross RD; Robertson SM
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2007; 28(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17883910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of olopatadine 0.2% ophthalmic solution versus fluticasone furoate nasal spray for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.
Rosenwasser LJ; Mahr T; Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Kennedy K
Allergy Asthma Proc; 2008; 29(6):644-53. PubMed ID: 19063816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a new formulation of olopatadine ophthalmic solution on nasal symptoms relative to placebo in two studies involving subjects with allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis.
Abelson MB; Gomes PJ; Vogelson CT; Pasquine TA; Turner FD; Wells DT; Robertson SM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2005 May; 21(5):683-91. PubMed ID: 15969867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-visit, randomized, placebo-controlled, conjunctival allergen challenge study of scanning and imaging technology for objective quantification of eyelid swelling in the allergic reaction with contralateral use of olopatadine and artificial tears.
Abelson MB; Pratt S; Mussoline JE; Townsend D
Clin Ther; 2003 Jul; 25(7):2070-84. PubMed ID: 12946551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A multicenter, double-masked, randomized evaluation of olopatadine 0.2% using the conjunctival allergen challenge model in Japanese patients with allergic conjunctivitis].
Ohno S;
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Dec; 116(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 23379201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of olopatadine HCI 0.1%, ketotifen fumarate 0.025%, epinastine HCI 0.05%, emedastine 0.05% and fluorometholone acetate 0.1% ophthalmic solutions for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a placebo-controlled environmental trial.
Borazan M; Karalezli A; Akova YA; Akman A; Kiyici H; Erbek SS
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Aug; 87(5):549-54. PubMed ID: 18631332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
