These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12852934)

  • 21. Distractor's salience does not determine feature suppression: A commentary on Wang and Theeuwes (2020).
    Ramgir A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):852-861. PubMed ID: 37276124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revisiting preview search at isoluminance: new onsets are not necessary for the preview advantage.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Watson DG; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1214-28. PubMed ID: 16502843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the role of top-down and bottom-up guidance in conjunction search: Singleton interference revisited.
    Dent K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Aug; 85(6):1784-1810. PubMed ID: 37017865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.
    Yamauchi K; Osugi T; Murakami I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():801. PubMed ID: 28559878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blink and you won't miss it: the preview benefit in visual marking survives internally generated eyeblinks.
    von Mühlenen A; Watson D; Gunnell DO
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1279-90. PubMed ID: 23398259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual marking beside the mark: prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets.
    Donk M; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 11521854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings.
    Schreij D; Owens C; Theeuwes J
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 18372744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of colour on preview search: anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hodsoll J
    Spat Vis; 2004; 17(4-5):389-415. PubMed ID: 15559111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contingent visual marking by transients.
    Peterson MS; Belopolsky AV; Kramer AF
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):695-710. PubMed ID: 12956578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual marking for search: behavioral and event-related potential analyses.
    Jacobsen T; Humphreys GW; Schröger E; Roeber U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):410-21. PubMed ID: 12421664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measuring the spread of spreading suppression: a time-course analysis of spreading suppression and its impact on attentional selection.
    Braithwaite JJ; Hulleman J; Andrews L; Humphreys GW
    Vision Res; 2010 Feb; 50(3):346-56. PubMed ID: 19969012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Visual change with moving displays: more evidence for color feature map inhibition during preview search.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Aug; 29(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 12967221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search.
    Burnham BR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jan; 67(1):81-101. PubMed ID: 15912874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Color grouping in space and time: evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search.
    Braithwaite JJ; Humphreys GW; Hodsoll J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Aug; 29(4):758-78. PubMed ID: 12967220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Limitations in attending to a feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference.
    Kumada T
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 10070200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search.
    de Fockert J; Rees G; Frith C; Lavie N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):751-9. PubMed ID: 15200703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.