112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12853595)
1. Protection of research subjects.
Kaufman JL
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 12853595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection of research subjects.
Bateman BT; Meyers PM
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92; author reply 188-92. PubMed ID: 12856646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Innovative care, medical research, and the ethics of informed consent.
Choi JM; Salter SA; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):330-2. PubMed ID: 17224375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons from the ARDS network ventilator trial design controversy.
Shanawani H
Respir Care Clin N Am; 2004 Sep; 10(3):317-28, vi. PubMed ID: 15458730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trial design and patient safety--the debate continues.
Steinbrook R
N Engl J Med; 2003 Aug; 349(7):629-30. PubMed ID: 12917298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Considerations of the institutional review board in artificial organ development.
Bosso JA
J Contemp Law; 1984; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 17076041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval.
Vaslef SN; Cairns CB; Falletta JM
Arch Surg; 2006 Oct; 141(10):1019-23; discussion 1024. PubMed ID: 17043281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical trials. Ventilator study gets second wind.
Malakoff D
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):149. PubMed ID: 12855776
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Numerous violations of federal informed consent requirements.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jan; 19(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14997901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An attempt to shut down discourse about a controversial practice will not benefit patients, human subjects, the bioethics community, or the research community.
Tamar-Mattis A
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Sep; 10(9):64-6. PubMed ID: 20818568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust.
de Melo-MartÃn I; Ho A
J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 18316464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The challenged but indispensable role of ethical committees for human clinical experimentation.
Tognoni G
Cortex; 2015 Oct; 71():420-2. PubMed ID: 26026706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Trials and errors: barriers to oversight of research conducted under the emergency research consent waiver.
Kipnis K; King NM; Nelson RM
IRB; 2006; 28(2):16-9. PubMed ID: 16770884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Pediatric research is necessary. The children must be guaranteed with a complete protection].
Dahlquist G
Lakartidningen; 2004 Jun; 101(26-27):2238-9. PubMed ID: 15281622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial-blood study has critics seeing red.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2006 Jun; 52(41):A17. PubMed ID: 16856302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Attracting attention: right or wrong.
Robichaud A
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Sep; 10(9):66-7. PubMed ID: 20818569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research on humans: what have we learned?
King NM
Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 12962102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Institutional review board use among dermatology researchers.
Adams BB; Gloster HM
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):346. PubMed ID: 17224377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
