112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12853595)
21. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Determining the appropriateness of including children in clinical research: how thick is the ice?
Sugarman J
JAMA; 2004 Jan; 291(4):494-6. PubMed ID: 14747509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Beginning anew: same principles, different direction for research ethics.
Simmerling M; Schwegler B
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):44-6; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: a review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies.
Lingler JH; Parker LS; DeKosky ST; Schulz R
IRB; 2006; 28(3):11-8. PubMed ID: 17036439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Unnecessary holes in the head.
Gillett GR
IRB; 2001; 23(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 12737174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Clinical trials on medical products for human use in the case of acutely incapacitated patients within the fields of neurology and neurosurgery; implications of the new European legislation].
Kompanje EJ; Maas AI; Dippel DW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Aug; 147(33):1585-9. PubMed ID: 12951727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Get on board with the research ethics review process.
Cummings L
Can Nurse; 2012 Oct; 108(8):28-33. PubMed ID: 23156015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Moving research from the cage to the bedside: the need for IACUC/IRB cooperation.
Hampshire V; DeRenzo E
Lab Anim (NY); 2002 Apr; 31(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 11927959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. How not to rethink research ethics.
Beauchamp TL
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):31-3; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reporting of ethical review of clinical research submitted to the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Perkins AC; Choi JM; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17224370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ethics.
Rosenfeld RM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 May; 138(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 18439456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Impediments to "T2" research: are ethics really to blame?
Lipworth W; Kerridge I
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):39-40. PubMed ID: 20694906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. An act concerning consent to research--protection of decisionally incapacitated individuals (Draft, August 1, 1997).
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 15573440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.
Miller FG; Brody H
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Why did Jesse die?
Walters J
Update; 2001 Nov; 17(2):E1. PubMed ID: 16130258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. IRB review of case reports.
Didlake R; Cannon CR
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):871; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 19041525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Waiver of consent in clinical observational research.
Lertsithichai P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 15962683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The task for ethics review: should research ethics boards address an approach or a paradigm?
Nelson CH; McPherson DH
NCEHR Commun; 2004; 12(2):11-22. PubMed ID: 15460563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
