513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12853777)
1. Correlation of minute (0.5 MM or less) focus of prostate adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy with radical prostatectomy specimen: role of prostate specific antigen density.
Allan RW; Sanderson H; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2003 Aug; 170(2 Pt 1):370-2. PubMed ID: 12853777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minute focus of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen.
Montanari E; Del Nero A; Gazzano G; Mangiarotti B; Bernardini P; Longo F; Cordima G; Itri E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2009 Mar; 81(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19499751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single small focus of prostate adenocarcinoma (< or = 1 mm and too small for grading) and clinical significant disease after radical prostatectomy.
Taverna G; Colombo P; Seveso M; Giusti G; Piccinelli A; Benetti A; Graziotti P
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2006 Jun; 78(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 16929604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
Boccon-Gibod LM; Dumonceau O; Toublanc M; Ravery V; Boccon-Gibod LA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors?
Chan TY; Chan DY; Stutzman KL; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2181-4. PubMed ID: 11696731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy features to predict "clinically insignificant" prostate cancer.
Loeb S; Roehl KA; Thaxton CS; Catalona WJ
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18436287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relating biopsy and clinical variables to radical prostatectomy findings: can insignificant and advanced prostate cancer be predicted in a screening population?
Anast JW; Andriole GL; Bismar TA; Yan Y; Humphrey PA
Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 15351590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of insignificant prostate cancers: analysis of preoperative parameters.
Irwin MB; Trapasso JG
Urology; 1994 Dec; 44(6):862-7; discussion 867-8. PubMed ID: 7527167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preoperative parameters to predict tumor volume in Japanese patients with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Furuya Y; Fuse H; Nagakawa O; Masai M
Int J Clin Oncol; 2002 Apr; 7(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 12018107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1C adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
Carter HB; Sauvageot J; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 1997 Jun; 157(6):2206-9. PubMed ID: 9146616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer.
Epstein JI; Walsh PC; Carmichael M; Brendler CB
JAMA; 1994 Feb; 271(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 7506797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: prediction of insignificant disease using free/total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings.
Epstein JI; Chan DW; Sokoll LJ; Walsh PC; Cox JL; Rittenhouse H; Wolfert R; Carter HB
J Urol; 1998 Dec; 160(6 Pt 2):2407-11. PubMed ID: 9817393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
