185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12854444)
1. Therapeutic obligation in clinical research.
Weijer C; Miller PB
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):3. PubMed ID: 12854444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Translational research beyond approval: a two-stage ethics review.
Sofaer N; Eyal N
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):W1-3. PubMed ID: 20694895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bench to bedside: mapping the moral terrain of clinical research.
Joffe S; Miller FG
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):30-42. PubMed ID: 18457227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenge of assuring continued post-trial access to beneficial treatment.
Grady C
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):425-35. PubMed ID: 15742586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. I thought we were in this together?
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 12189071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Unacceptable risk in pregnancy: whose choice and responsibility?
Perry C
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 21534159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Making research a requirement of treatment: why we should sometimes let doctors pressure patients to participate in research.
Orentlicher D
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 16295261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International codes of research ethics: current controversies and the future.
Levine RJ
Indiana Law Rev; 2002; 35(2):557-67. PubMed ID: 16189916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A critique of clinical equipoise. Therapeutic misconception in the ethics of clinical trials.
Miller FG; Brody H
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(3):19-28. PubMed ID: 12854452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust.
de Melo-MartÃn I; Ho A
J Med Ethics; 2008 Mar; 34(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 18316464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The moral foundations of equipoise and its role in international research.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):48-51; discussion W42-5. PubMed ID: 16885105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical placebo interventions are unethical, unnecessary, and unprofessional.
Hróbjartsson A
J Clin Ethics; 2008; 19(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 18552056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflating scientific with clinical considerations.
van der Graaf R; van Delden JJ
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):58-9. PubMed ID: 19998198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Doctor vs. scientist?
Jansen LA
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(2):3. PubMed ID: 18457215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical perspective on placebo research: looking back, looking forward.
Dworkin RW
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Sep; 9(9):54-5. PubMed ID: 19998196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
de Melo-Martin I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):28-36. PubMed ID: 19003704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diverse ethics of translational research in the developing world.
Lang T
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(8):41-2. PubMed ID: 20694907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clarifying confusions about coercion.
Hawkins JS; Emanuel EJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 16295260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Two dogmas of research ethics and the integrative approach to human-subjects research.
London AJ
J Med Philos; 2007; 32(2):99-116. PubMed ID: 17454417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Obligations in offering to disclose genetic research results.
Fernandez CV; Weijer C
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):44-6; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
