These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12854540)
21. The constitutional morality of abortion. Brownstein A; Dau P Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Allocation of decision-making rights to frozen embryos. Poole EK Am J Fam Law; 1990; 4(1):67-102. PubMed ID: 11659329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Social values in a brave new world: toward a public policy regarding embryo status and in vitro fertilization. Dickman DG St Louis Univ Law J; 1985; 29(3):817-51. PubMed ID: 11649208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Constitution and abortion. Campbell A Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Embryo research. Robertson JA Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986; 24(1):15-37. PubMed ID: 11658730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. "Unwanted, anonymous, biological descendants": mandatory donation laws and laws prohibiting preembryo discard violate the constitutional right to privacy. Brown JP Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1993; 28(1):183-237. PubMed ID: 11659778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Genesis retold: legal issues raised by the cryopreservation of preimplantation human embryos. Saltarelli JJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1985; 36(3):1021-53. PubMed ID: 16086476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate. Langley DB Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Logic, law and abortion. Degnan M; Pannier R Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro embryos and DNA profiling: far from clear legal reform. Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):15-27. PubMed ID: 15032096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo. Cuva AJ N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Can Congress create people? Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Text of Vatican's doctrinal statement on human reproduction. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A14-7. PubMed ID: 11646510 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The protection of the human embryo in vitro. Report by the Working Party of the Human Embryo and Fetus. Council of Europe. Steering Committee on Bioethics Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2004; 10(1):5-35. PubMed ID: 15459990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Taking rights seriously in the abortion case. Dworkin R Ratio Juris; 1990 Mar; 3(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 11656052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Destructive stem-cell research on human embryos. Doerflinger R Origins; 1999 Apr; 28(45):769, 771-773. PubMed ID: 11660699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Maryland court rules on embryo standing. Summer D J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):108. PubMed ID: 11644714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]