These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12854618)

  • 1. Realistic human head model for EEG from both the geometry and conductivity aspects.
    Wen P; Pope K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12854618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of inhomogeneous tissue anisotropy on potential distribution within head model.
    Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2003 Sep; 26(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 14626850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved EEG source analysis using low-resolution conductivity estimation in a four-compartment finite element head model.
    Lew S; Wolters CH; Anwander A; Makeig S; MacLeod RS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2862-78. PubMed ID: 19117275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG human head modelling based on heterogeneous tissue conductivity.
    Wen P; Li Y
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Sep; 29(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 17058584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
    Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Modeling the effect of the layer thickness and tissue conductivities of the head and the brain on the EEG potentials using finite element method].
    Stavtsev AIu; Ushakov VL; Verkhliutov VM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2007; 57(6):742-52. PubMed ID: 18592709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volume currents in forward and inverse magnetoencephalographic simulations using realistic head models.
    Van Uitert R; Weinstein D; Johnson C
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12572653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for anisotropic inhomogeneous head tissue conductivity in human head modelling.
    Bashar MR; Li Y; Wen P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 33(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 20502999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Head model extension for the study of bioelectric phenomena.
    Bruno P; Vatta F; Mininel S; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():59-64. PubMed ID: 12724869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of skull-conductivity misspecification on inverse source localization in realistically shaped finite element head models.
    Pohlmeier R; Buchner H; Knoll G; Rienäcker A; Beckmann R; Pesch J
    Brain Topogr; 1997; 9(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 9104826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiregion bicentric-spheres models of the head for the simulation of bioelectric phenomena.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 52(3):384-9. PubMed ID: 15759568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The inhomogeneous conductivity property of cranial tissues and its representation in numerical head models.
    Wen P; He F; Sammut K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1999 Sep; 22(3):92-8. PubMed ID: 10816766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational modeling of human head electromagnetics for source localization of milliscale brain dynamics.
    Malony AD; Salman A; Turovets S; Tucker D; Volkov V; Li K; Song JE; Biersdorff S; Davey C; Hoge C; Hammond D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():329-35. PubMed ID: 21335813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
    Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Representation of bioelectric current sources using Whitney elements in the finite element method.
    Tanzer IO; Järvenpää S; Nenonen J; Somersalo E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3023-39. PubMed ID: 15972978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.
    Marin G; Guerin C; Baillet S; Garnero L; Meunier G
    Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(4):250-69. PubMed ID: 9704264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.