These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12854927)

  • 1. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R; Greaves PC
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
    Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
    BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abruptio placentae associated with misoprostol use in women with preeclampsia.
    Fontenot MT; Lewis DF; Barton CB; Jones EM; Moore JA; Evans AT
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):653-8. PubMed ID: 16363752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
    Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
    BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Saeed GA; Fakhar S; Nisar N; Alam AY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 21482368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Labor induction with 25-microg misoprostol vaginal capsules.
    Santo S; Lourenço R; Centeno M; Pargana L; Clode N; Ferreira H; da Graça LM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 68(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 19797903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
    De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.