These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12855367)

  • 1. The perceptual effects of interphase gap duration in cochlear implant stimulation.
    McKay CM; Henshall KR
    Hear Res; 2003 Jul; 181(1-2):94-9. PubMed ID: 12855367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of Pulse Shape and Interphase Gaps on Speech Perception and Perceived Sound Quality in Electrical Hearing.
    Liepins R; Kaider A; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Honeder C; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 35925830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loudness Perception and Dynamic Range Depending on Interphase Gaps of Biphasic Pulses in Cochlear Implants.
    Pieper SH; Brill S; Bahmer A
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1251-1257. PubMed ID: 31972773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1985 May; 18(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3840159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.
    McKay CM; Remine MD; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1514-24. PubMed ID: 11572362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alternative pulse shapes in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Macherey O; Carlyon RP; Deeks JM; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 242(1-2):154-63. PubMed ID: 18468821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1061-74. PubMed ID: 9714925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The perceptual effects of current pulse duration in electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):998-1009. PubMed ID: 10462805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
    Shepherd RK; Javel E
    Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Azadpour M; McKay CM; Svirsky MA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 19(3):287-299. PubMed ID: 29532190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 19068227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychophysical measures from electrical stimulation of the human cochlear nucleus.
    Shannon RV; Otto SR
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):159-68. PubMed ID: 2228792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 19063956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitch and loudness estimation for single and multiple pulse per period electric pulse rates by cochlear implant patients.
    Busby PA; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1687-95. PubMed ID: 9069636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Underlying Mechanism of Preventing Facial Nerve Stimulation by Triphasic Pulse Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users Assessed With Objective Measure.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):1231-7. PubMed ID: 27636387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.