214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12856463)
1. The Bipartisan Patient Protection Act: greater liability on managed care plans.
Mayers UW
Ann Health Law; 2003; 12(2):341-65, table of contents. PubMed ID: 12856463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The states, Congress, or the courts: who will be first to reform ERISA remedies?
Rooney CD
Ann Health Law; 1998; 7():73-106. PubMed ID: 10187382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do we still need a federal patients' bill of rights?
Law SA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 3(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 12825425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court and managed-care liability.
Erb CT; Rich RF
N Engl J Med; 2005 Jan; 352(2):201-3; author reply 201-3. PubMed ID: 15647587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Independent medical review: expanding legal remedies to achieve managed care accountability.
Berman-Sandler L
Ann Health Law; 2004; 13(1):233-302, table of contents. PubMed ID: 15002185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Supreme Court limits lawsuits against managed care organizations.
Jost TS
Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-417-26. PubMed ID: 15451950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient bill of rights 2001.
Benjamin GC
Physician Exec; 2001; 27(3):75-7. PubMed ID: 11387902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expanded managed care liability: what impact on employer coverage?
Studdert DM; Sage WM; Gresenz CR; Hensler DR
Health Aff (Millwood); 1999; 18(6):7-27. PubMed ID: 10650685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of state managed care liability statutes.
Hall MA; Agrawal G
Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; 22(5):138-45. PubMed ID: 14515889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evolving effect of ERISA on managed care liability.
Peterson CA
Hosp Top; 2001; 79(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 11558256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clash of the Titans: State All-Payer Claims Reporting Systems Meet ERISA Preemption.
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2015 Dec; 93(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 26626981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The United State Supreme Court and health law: the year in review. The Supreme Court federalizes managed care liability.
Ruger TW
J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 15490600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients' bill of rights: legislative cure-all or prescription for disaster?
Binette MJ
North Carol Law Rev; 2003; 81():653-96. PubMed ID: 15744898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Upon further review. 'External review' of medical claim denials is now the law of the land nearly nationwide. But the system has its fans and foes.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb; 35(6):28-31, 35. PubMed ID: 15730203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Countdown to patient protection.
Roslokken DW
Bus Health; 1999 Apr; 17(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 10351246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Managed care and ERISA: synopsis and case law review.
Gerbasi JB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):364-71. PubMed ID: 14584538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A framework for analysis of ERISA preemption in suits against health plans and a call for reform.
Scheutzow SO
J Law Health; 1996-1997; 11(1-2):195-219. PubMed ID: 10176242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
