174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12856646)
1. Protection of research subjects.
Bateman BT; Meyers PM
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92; author reply 188-92. PubMed ID: 12856646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What do people at risk for Alzheimer disease think about surrogate consent for research?
Schenk DB; Gilman S
Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1785-6. PubMed ID: 16769971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An act concerning consent to research--protection of decisionally incapacitated individuals (Draft, August 1, 1997).
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 15573440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: a survey of clinical investigators.
Karlawish JH; Knopman D; Clark CM; Morris JC; Marson D; Whitehouse PJ; Kawas CH
IRB; 2002; 24(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 12737167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New European rules regarding the approval of clinical trials, the role of ethics committees and the protection of subjects.
Nys H
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2012 Dec; 60(6):405-14. PubMed ID: 23064523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Source data verification in clinical trials involving the temporarily incapacitated subject: is there a missing link in the notion of proxy consent?
Wilson JR
IRB; 1992; 14(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11651394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Protection of research subjects.
Berger JT
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92; author reply 188-92. PubMed ID: 12856647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in clinical research: policies and practices in Singapore.
Ramachandran AJ
J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15239181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimenting on human subjects.
May WE
Linacre Q; 1974 Nov; 41(4):238-52. PubMed ID: 11662103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Protection of research subjects.
Kaufman JL
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92. PubMed ID: 12853595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research involving cognitively impaired adults.
Karlawish JH
N Engl J Med; 2003 Apr; 348(14):1389-92. PubMed ID: 12672869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Innovative care, medical research, and the ethics of informed consent.
Choi JM; Salter SA; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):330-2. PubMed ID: 17224375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Consent to the use of an investigational cardiac assist device.
Holder AR
IRB; 1979 Mar; 1(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11662738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. State court says informed consent procedures were unacceptable.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 May; 15(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulating research with vulnerable populations: litigation gone awry.
Oldham JM; Haimowitz S; Delano SJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 15573435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Innovation in human research protection: the AbioCor artificial heart trial.
Morreim EH; Webb GE; Gordon HL; Brody B; Casarett D; Rosenfeld K; Sabin J; Lantos JD; Morenz B; Krouse R; Goodman S
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(5):W6-16. PubMed ID: 16997807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nature and effects of consent with respect to the right to life and the right to physical and mental integrity in the medical field: criminal and private law aspects.
Castel JG
Alta Law Rev; 1978; 16(3):293-356. PubMed ID: 11663064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Attracting attention: right or wrong.
Robichaud A
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Sep; 10(9):66-7. PubMed ID: 20818569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cynthia's dilemma: consenting to heroin prescription.
Charland LC
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):37-47. PubMed ID: 12189075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
