These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1285753)

  • 1. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.
    Brazier JE; Harper R; Jones NM; O'Cathain A; Thomas KJ; Usherwood T; Westlake L
    BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6846):160-4. PubMed ID: 1285753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey.
    Walters SJ; Munro JF; Brazier JE
    Age Ageing; 2001 Jul; 30(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 11509313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing the validity of the Euroqol and comparing it with the SF-36 health survey questionnaire.
    Brazier J; Jones N; Kind P
    Qual Life Res; 1993 Jun; 2(3):169-80. PubMed ID: 8401453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for the sensitivity of the SF-36 health status measure to inequalities in health: results from the Oxford healthy lifestyles survey.
    Jenkinson C; Layte R; Coulter A; Wright L
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 8935473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia.
    Jenkinson C; Peto V; Coulter A
    Qual Health Care; 1996 Mar; 5(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 10157276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample.
    Jenkinson C; Wright L; Coulter A
    Qual Life Res; 1994 Feb; 3(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8142947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The SF36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS?
    Garratt AM; Ruta DA; Abdalla MI; Buckingham JK; Russell IT
    BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6890):1440-4. PubMed ID: 8518640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient based studies.
    Ruta DA; Abdalla MI; Garratt AM; Coutts A; Russell IT
    Qual Health Care; 1994 Dec; 3(4):180-5. PubMed ID: 10140231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the validity of the SF-36 General Health Survey.
    Stansfeld SA; Roberts R; Foot SP
    Qual Life Res; 1997 Apr; 6(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 9226979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients.
    Anderson C; Laubscher S; Burns R
    Stroke; 1996 Oct; 27(10):1812-6. PubMed ID: 8841336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of the construct validity of the SF-12 summary scores across ethnic groups.
    Jenkinson C; Chandola T; Coulter A; Bruster S
    J Public Health Med; 2001 Sep; 23(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 11585190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey.
    Bowling A; Bond M; Jenkinson C; Lamping DL
    J Public Health Med; 1999 Sep; 21(3):255-70. PubMed ID: 10528952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SF-36 health survey reliability, validity and norms for New Zealand.
    Scott KM; Tobias MI; Sarfati D; Haslett SJ
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 1999 Aug; 23(4):401-6. PubMed ID: 10462864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population.
    Brazier JE; Walters SJ; Nicholl JP; Kohler B
    Qual Life Res; 1996 Apr; 5(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 8998488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.
    Jenkinson C; Stewart-Brown S; Petersen S; Paice C
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1999 Jan; 53(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10326053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument.
    Essink-Bot ML; Krabbe PF; Bonsel GJ; Aaronson NK
    Med Care; 1997 May; 35(5):522-37. PubMed ID: 9140339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population*.
    Huang IC; Wu AW; Frangakis C
    Qual Life Res; 2006 Feb; 15(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 16411027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial.
    Dorman P; Slattery J; Farrell B; Dennis M; Sandercock P
    Stroke; 1998 Jan; 29(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 9445330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
    Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
    Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring health status in psychiatric community surveys: internal and external validity of the Spanish version of the SF-36.
    Ayuso-Mateos JL; Lasa L; Vázquez-Barquero JL; Oviedo A; Diez-Manrique JF
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1999 Jan; 99(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 10066004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 84.