These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12857706)

  • 21. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
    Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An analysis of dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopic examinations.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7322044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A computer model of an image intensifier system working under automatic brightness control.
    Reilly AJ; Sutton DG
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):938-48. PubMed ID: 11675312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feasibility of a large area x-ray sensitive vidicon for medical fluoroscopy: resolution and lag factors.
    Luhta R; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):621-31. PubMed ID: 9167154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
    Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy.
    Wang J; Blackburn TJ
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1471-7. PubMed ID: 10992034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A review of image quality and dose issues in digital fluorography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Kotre CJ; Marshall NW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):73-6. PubMed ID: 11487847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: general overview of fluoroscopic imaging.
    Schueler BA
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1115-26. PubMed ID: 10903700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Introduction to constancy check protocols in fluoroscopic systems.
    Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):65-8. PubMed ID: 11487845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A technique for very high accuracy image intensifier calibration.
    Viant WJ; Phillips R; Bielby MS; Zhu Y; Griffiths JG; Mohsen AM; Sherman KP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():379-80. PubMed ID: 10538391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. OPTIMISATION OF PATIENT DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED CERVICAL SPINE SURGERY: A PHANTOM-BASED STUDY.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Gatzounis GD; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 30508126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality control measurements for fluoroscopy systems in eight countries participating in the SENTINEL EU coordination action.
    Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Kottou S; Gray L; O'Connor U; Salat D; Kepler K; Kaplanis P; Jankowski J; Schreiner A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):237-43. PubMed ID: 18310607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Intensifier fluorography and full-size radiography (author's transl)].
    Renda F; Sanità Di Toppi G; Di Giandomenico V; Marano P
    Radiol Med; 1981 Mar; 67(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 7268087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A set of X-ray test objects for image quality control in digital subtraction fluorography. II: Application and interpretation of results.
    Cowen AR; Workman A; Haywood JM; Clarke OF
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1011-8. PubMed ID: 3315091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Characteristics of an x-ray image intensifier that determine its suitability for roentgenoscopy].
    Gurvich AM; Pereslegin IA; Rozenshtraukh LS; Shamanov AA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1977; (6):57-63. PubMed ID: 595333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fluoroscopic image quality in the film and filmless eras: a standardized comparison performed in coronary interventional facilities.
    Laskey W; Wondrow M; Chambers C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 12594708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.