These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12857793)

  • 1. A researcher's guide to patents.
    Shear RH; Kelley TE
    Plant Physiol; 2003 Jul; 132(3):1127-30. PubMed ID: 12857793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biotechnology patents: strategies for meeting economic and ethical concerns.
    Gold ER
    Nat Genet; 2002 Apr; 30(4):359. PubMed ID: 11925560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalents in biotechnology patents.
    Auer HE
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 12610574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US Supreme Court decision could compromise biotech patents.
    Robertson D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 May; 19(5):394. PubMed ID: 11328981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
    Robertson D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Untangling biotechnology patents--when is 'obvious' not obvious?
    Nixon A
    Trends Biotechnol; 1992 Aug; 10(8):272-3. PubMed ID: 1368379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monsanto wins seven-year court battle for seed patent.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6990):330. PubMed ID: 15164024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Super-enzyme patents get their day in court.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):767. PubMed ID: 12397315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brave new industry, that has such patents in it! Reflections on the economic consequences of patenting DNA.
    Cockburn IM
    Adv Genet; 2003; 50():385-98; discussion 507-10. PubMed ID: 14714701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US to rule on research patent.
    Ruttimann J
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7084):587. PubMed ID: 16572133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nontraditional publications and their effect on patentable inventions.
    Garabedian TE
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Apr; 20(4):401-2. PubMed ID: 11923849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The scope of utility in the twenty-first century: new guidance for gene-related patents.
    Summers TM
    Georgetown Law J; 2003 Jan; 91(2):475-509. PubMed ID: 15046071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biotech nightmare: does Cetus own PCR?
    Barinaga M
    Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4995):739-40. PubMed ID: 1990435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patent fight sparks biological warfare in the drug industry.
    Fortune; 2000 Jul; 142(3):40, 42. PubMed ID: 11066662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patenting transgenics in the European Union.
    Baggot B
    Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Mar; 16(3):299-301. PubMed ID: 9528013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biotech patents-business as usual?
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 26(12):1326. PubMed ID: 19060861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. More patent troubles about genes.
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6506):485. PubMed ID: 7990908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Schmeiser versus Monsanto.
    Sechley K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):803-4. PubMed ID: 15229531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Napster case spills into biotech sector.
    Bouchie A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Sep; 22(9):1185-6. PubMed ID: 15384189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ownership at too high a price?
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):953. PubMed ID: 12949537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.