These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12858057)

  • 1. N100m in children possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2003 May; 14(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 12858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. N100m in adults possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(9):1383-6. PubMed ID: 15194857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1775-9. PubMed ID: 16237325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. N100m latency shortening caused by selective attention.
    Nomura Y; Kawase T; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    Brain Res; 2021 Jan; 1751():147177. PubMed ID: 33121923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.
    Seither-Preisler A; Patterson R; Krumbholz K; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 16464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric differences in frequency dependent dipole orientation of the human auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Kreitschmann-Andermahr I; Emmerich E; Nowak H; Sauer H
    Neurosci Lett; 1998 Dec; 258(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 9875538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Seither-Preisler A; Lammertmann C; Lütkenhöner B
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Jul; 13(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 12816892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex.
    Rif J; Hari R; Hämäläinen MS; Sams M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Dec; 79(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 1721574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right hemispheric predominance in the segregation of mistuned partials.
    Hiraumi H; Nagamine T; Morita T; Naito Y; Fukuyama H; Ito J
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 22(7):1821-4. PubMed ID: 16197525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure.
    Fujioka T; Trainor LJ; Ross B; Kakigi R; Pantev C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1010-21. PubMed ID: 15298788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory evoked potentials to abrupt pitch and timbre change of complex tones: electrophysiological evidence of 'streaming'?
    Jones SJ; Longe O; Vaz Pato M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Mar; 108(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 9566626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Piano tones evoke stronger magnetic fields than pure tones or noise, both in musicians and non-musicians.
    Lütkenhöner B; Seither-Preisler A; Seither S
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16337814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective attention in the presence of music: an event-related potentials (ERP) study.
    Dalbokova D; Kolev P; Kristeva R
    Biol Psychol; 1988 Jun; 26(1-3):307-19. PubMed ID: 3207789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.