BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12858487)

  • 1. [Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and management of low-responder cases (HOO)].
    Vladimirov IaK
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):23-6. PubMed ID: 12858487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Poor responder protocols for in-vitro fertilization: options and results.
    Loutradis D; Vomvolaki E; Drakakis P
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 20(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 18660689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Premature ovarian failure: which protocols?].
    Merviel P; Lourdel E; Boulard V; Cabry R; Claeys C; Oliéric MF; Sanguinet P; Brasseur F; Henri I; Copin H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Sep; 36(9):872-81. PubMed ID: 18703373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of coasting in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix.
    Bahceci M; Ulug U; Tosun S; Erden HF; Bayazit N
    Fertil Steril; 2006 May; 85(5):1523-5. PubMed ID: 16566935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Coasting and ovarian stimulation protocols in high-responder patients undergoing assisted conception].
    Merviel P; Claeys C; Héraud MH; Lourdel E; Lanta S; Barbier F; Nasreddine A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 Sep; 33(9):703-12. PubMed ID: 16129645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in ovarian stimulation: the role of endometrial receptivity.
    Orvieto R; Meltzer S; Rabinson J; Zohav E; Anteby EY; Nahum R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1294-6. PubMed ID: 18178197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short coasting of 1 or 2 days by withholding both gonadotropins and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist prevents ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome without compromising the outcome.
    Moon HS; Joo BS; Moon SE; Lee SK; Kim KS; Koo JS
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2172-8. PubMed ID: 18439601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aromatase inhibition reduces the dose of gonadotropin required for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.
    Mitwally MF; Casper RF
    J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2004 Sep; 11(6):406-15. PubMed ID: 15350255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [How to prevent completely ovarian hyperstimulation with GnRH-based stimulation protocols].
    Kol S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 40(4):36-41. PubMed ID: 11803870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a review for the non-ART patient.
    Willis MY; Browne AS; Session DR; Spencer JB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2011 Apr; 63(2):119-35. PubMed ID: 21508902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does day 3 luteinizing-hormone level predict IVF success in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues?
    Orvieto R; Meltzer S; Rabinson J; Gemer O; Anteby EY; Nahum R
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Oct; 90(4):1297-300. PubMed ID: 18249369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of poor responders: can outcomes be improved with a novel gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist/letrozole protocol?
    Schoolcraft WB; Surrey ES; Minjarez DA; Stevens JM; Gardner DK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 17482177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New tools for optimizing endometrial receptivity in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: aromatase inhibitors and LH/(mini)hCG.
    de Ziegler D; Mattenberger C; Schwarz C; Ibecheole V; Fournet N; Bianchi-Demicheli F
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2004 Dec; 1034():262-77. PubMed ID: 15731318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aromatase inhibitors in ovulation induction.
    Mitwally MF; Casper RF
    Semin Reprod Med; 2004 Feb; 22(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 15083382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols.
    Trew GH
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2002 Feb; 5(1):G13-6; discussion G16-8, G41-8. PubMed ID: 11939156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Onset and maintenance of the luteal phase with GnRH agonists or hCG in cycles under GnRH antagonists].
    Olivennes F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Oct; 33(6 Pt 2):3S24-6. PubMed ID: 15643682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation and treatment of the poor responder.
    Schoolcraft WB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 49(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 16456340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Research on the protocol of limited ovarian stimulation to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome].
    Zhu YM; Gao HJ; He RH; Huang HF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Nov; 41(11):740-4. PubMed ID: 17327030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. GnRH analogs: depot versus short formulations.
    Dal Prato L; Borini A; Cattoli M; Bonu MA; Sereni E; Flamigni C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Jul; 115 Suppl 1():S40-3. PubMed ID: 15196715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation.
    Malmusi S; La Marca A; Giulini S; Xella S; Tagliasacchi D; Marsella T; Volpe A
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):402-6. PubMed ID: 16084881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.