These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12858958)

  • 1. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.
    Vishton PM; Jones ED; Stevens JA
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():431-5. PubMed ID: 26245648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The functional subdivision of the visual brain: Is there a real illusion effect on action? A multi-lab replication study.
    Kopiske KK; Bruno N; Hesse C; Schenk T; Franz VH
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():130-52. PubMed ID: 27156056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Planning to reach for an object changes how the reacher perceives it.
    Vishton PM; Stephens NJ; Nelson LA; Morra SE; Brunick KL; Stevens JA
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Aug; 18(8):713-9. PubMed ID: 17680943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.
    Franz VH; Bülthoff HH; Fahle M
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Apr; 149(4):470-7. PubMed ID: 12677327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual processes underlie the effect of the Ebbinghaüs illusion on control of grasping.
    Chen Z; Zhang N; Saunders JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1472-1492. PubMed ID: 34843356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
    Katsumata H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action.
    Vishton PM; Rea JG; Cutting JE; Nuñez LN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Dec; 25(6):1659-72. PubMed ID: 10641314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Sander parallelogram illusion dissociates action and perception despite control for the litany of past confounds.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA; Merritt KE; Enns JT
    Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():163-176. PubMed ID: 29100659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?
    Franz VH
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Aug; 151(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 12851803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the size-illusion effect on prehensile movements depend on preview duration for visuomotor process?
    Katsumata H
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 24446928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 9526087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does visuomotor adaptation contribute to illusion-resistant grasping?
    Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Taylor JA; Domini F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):827-845. PubMed ID: 28853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping?. Two- and three-dimensional targets.
    Kwok RM; Braddick OJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):932-40. PubMed ID: 12667529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.
    Uccelli S; Pisu V; Riggio L; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):953-965. PubMed ID: 30683958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness.
    Gonzalez CL; Ganel T; Goodale MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 95(6):3496-501. PubMed ID: 16495359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.