These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12858992)

  • 41. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.
    Waldron-Soler KM; Martella RC; Marchand-Martella NE; Ebey TL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 10738957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: if you feel bad, do it!
    Tice DM; Bratslavsky E; Baumeister RF
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Jan; 80(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 11195891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Delay of gratification: decisional self-control and experience with delay intervals.
    Litrownik AJ; Franzini LR; Geller S; Geller M
    Am J Ment Defic; 1977 Sep; 82(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 907005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A systematic evaluation of preferences identified through person-centered planning for people with profound multiple disabilities.
    Reid DH; Everson JM; Green CW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):467-77. PubMed ID: 10641301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.
    Shore BA; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 9103985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities.
    Foster-Johnson L; Ferro J; Dunlap G
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 7928791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The story of Jane.
    Clarke I
    Nurs Times; 1983 Feb 23-Mar 1; 79(8):33-5. PubMed ID: 6550842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.
    DeLeon IG; Chase JA; Frank-Crawford MA; Carreau-Webster AB; Triggs MM; Bullock CE; Jennett HK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 24782203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Response-reinforcer relations and resistance to change.
    Podlesnik CA; Shahan TA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jan; 77(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 17706897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Impulsive choice in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Fox AT; Hand DJ; Reilly MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 187(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 17950930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A comparison of the effects of brief rules, a timer, and preferred toys on self-control.
    Newquist MH; Dozier CL; Neidert PL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(3):497-509. PubMed ID: 23060664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
    Lalli JS; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessment and treatment of elopement: a replication and extension.
    Tarbox RS; Wallace MD; Williams L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 12858987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
    Ong EL; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The role of response-reinforcer relationship in discrimination learning of mentally retarded persons.
    Delprato DJ; Pappalardo PA; Holmes PA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1984 Nov; 89(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 6517108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A comparison of reinforcer assessment methods: the utility of verbal and pictorial choice procedures.
    Northup J; George T; Jones K; Broussard C; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):201-12. PubMed ID: 8682736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Self-management approaches.
    Gardner WI; Cole CL
    Monogr Am Assoc Ment Retard; 1989; (12):19-35. PubMed ID: 2664399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.
    Egel AL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1981; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.