These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12858992)

  • 61. Use of extinction and reinforcement to increase food consumption and reduce expulsion.
    Coe DA; Babbitt RL; Williams KE; Hajimihalis C; Snyder AM; Ballard C; Efron LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):581-3. PubMed ID: 9316264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effects of time-out from auditory reinforcement on two problem behaviors.
    Ford JE; Veltri-Ford A
    Ment Retard; 1980 Dec; 18(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 7253926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Functional analysis and intervention for breath holding.
    Kern L; Mauk JE; Marder TJ; Mace FC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):339-40. PubMed ID: 7592150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice.
    Kheramin S; Body S; Herrera FM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Deakin JF; Anderson IM
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 156(1):145-52. PubMed ID: 15474659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Infrequent, but not frequent, reinforcers produce more variable responding and deficient sustained attention in young children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Aase H; Sagvolden T
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 May; 47(5):457-71. PubMed ID: 16671929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps.
    Green CW; Reid DH; Canipe VS; Gardner SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 1836459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The reductive effects of noncontingent reinforcement fixed-time versus variable-time schedules.
    Carr JE; Kellum KK; Chong IM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 11800191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.
    Trosclair-Lasserre NM; Lerman DC; Call NA; Addison LR; Kodak T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 18595284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Preference for water-related items in Angelman syndrome, Down syndrome and non-specific intellectual disability.
    Didden R; Korzilius H; Sturmey P; Lancioni GE; Curfs LM
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2008 Mar; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18300168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Impulsive choice as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self- administration and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in male and female rats.
    Perry JL; Nelson SE; Carroll ME
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2008 Apr; 16(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 18489020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Sensitivity theory and mental retardation: why functional analysis is not enough.
    Reiss S; Havercamp SM
    Am J Ment Retard; 1997 May; 101(6):553-66. PubMed ID: 9152472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Behavioral assessment of impulsivity: a comparison of children with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Neef NA; Marckel J; Ferreri SJ; Bicard DF; Endo S; Aman MG; Miller KM; Jung S; Nist L; Armstrong N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 15898472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Assessment of impulsivity and the development of self-control in students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Neef NA; Bicard DF; Endo S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):397-408. PubMed ID: 11800181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Contingency management: schedule effects.
    Roll JM; Shoptaw S
    Psychiatry Res; 2006 Sep; 144(1):91-3. PubMed ID: 16905197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Functional analysis of precursors for serious problem behavior and related intervention.
    Langdon NA; Carr EG; Owen-Deschryver JS
    Behav Modif; 2008 Nov; 32(6):804-27. PubMed ID: 18456900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effects of increased response effort and reinforcer delay on choice and aberrant behavior.
    Gwinn MM; Derby KM; Fisher W; Kurtz P; Fahs A; Augustine M; McLaughlin TF
    Behav Modif; 2005 Jul; 29(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 15911686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Goh HL; Worsdell AS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):439-49. PubMed ID: 9378681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Teaching self-control with qualitatively different reinforcers.
    Passage M; Tincani M; Hantula DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 23322941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities.
    Klatt KP; Sherman JA; Sheldon JB
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):495-506. PubMed ID: 11214025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    da Costa Araújo S; Body S; Hampson CL; Langley RW; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 202(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 19463712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.