These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12859030)

  • 1. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of M bias in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
    Liu W; Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Mi X; Setoguchi S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 176(10):938-48. PubMed ID: 23100247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
    Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding causal inference: the future direction in sports injury prevention.
    Shrier I
    Clin J Sport Med; 2007 May; 17(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 17513917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating bias due to population stratification in epidemiologic studies of gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 16434597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of good causation studies.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12806562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the "obesity paradox".
    Banack HR; Kaufman JS
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1111-4. PubMed ID: 26187718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What random assignment does and does not do.
    Krause MS; Howard KI
    J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between antibiotic resistance and community prescribing: a critical review of bias and confounding in published studies.
    Steinke D; Davey P
    Clin Infect Dis; 2001 Sep; 33 Suppl 3():S193-205. PubMed ID: 11524719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics.
    Ananth CV; Schisterman EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 28427805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confounding and bias in the attributable fraction.
    Darrow LA; Steenland NK
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 20975564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causal diagrams and change variables.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Feb; 18(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 20831667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.