These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12859030)

  • 21. Simple formulas for gauging the potential impacts of population stratification bias.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 167(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 17881384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.
    Vansteelandt S; Bekaert M; Claeskens G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Feb; 21(1):7-30. PubMed ID: 21075803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improved estimation of controlled direct effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding of intermediate variables.
    Kaufman S; Kaufman JS; MacLehose RF; Greenland S; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1683-702. PubMed ID: 15742358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Instrumental variables: application and limitations.
    Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
    Epidemiology; 2006 May; 17(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 16617274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The language of epidemiology (XV): Biases in case-control studies.
    Aronson SM
    R I Med; 1993 Jan; 76(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 8428032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bias: a review of current understanding.
    Adebiyi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 39(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 21416795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The association of body mass index with health outcomes: causal, inconsistent, or confounded?
    Shahar E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 170(8):957-8. PubMed ID: 19755631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable.
    Elwert F; Winship C
    Annu Rev Sociol; 2014 Jul; 40():31-53. PubMed ID: 30111904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection.
    Williamson EJ; Aitken Z; Lawrie J; Dharmage SC; Burgess JA; Forbes AB
    Respirology; 2014 Apr; 19(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24447391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Estimating causal effects.
    Maldonado G; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2002 Apr; 31(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 11980807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The birth weight "paradox" uncovered?
    Hernández-Díaz S; Schisterman EF; Hernán MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 164(11):1115-20. PubMed ID: 16931543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A positive or a negative confounding variable? A simple teaching aid for clinicians and students.
    Mehio-Sibai A; Feinleib M; Sibai TA; Armenian HK
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 15(6):421-3. PubMed ID: 15967387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Educational Note: Paradoxical collider effect in the analysis of non-communicable disease epidemiological data: a reproducible illustration and web application.
    Luque-Fernandez MA; Schomaker M; Redondo-Sanchez D; Jose Sanchez Perez M; Vaidya A; Schnitzer ME
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):640-653. PubMed ID: 30561628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Instrumental Variable Analyses and Selection Bias.
    Canan C; Lesko C; Lau B
    Epidemiology; 2017 May; 28(3):396-398. PubMed ID: 28169934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dependence of confounding on the target population: a modification of causal graphs to account for co-action.
    Flanders WD; Johnson CY; Howards PP; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 21737305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consequences of exposure measurement error for confounder identification in environmental epidemiology.
    Budtz-Jørgensen E; Keiding N; Grandjean P; Weihe P; White RF
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(19):3089-100. PubMed ID: 12973789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Roaming through methodology. XXXVII. Unintentional population stratification in genetic case-control studies].
    Hottenga JJ; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ; van Duijn CM
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jan; 146(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11802331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.