These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12859067)

  • 1. Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the cervical spine.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schaefer J; Scholz M; Ludwig K; Schleicher P; Haas NP
    J Neurosurg; 2003 Jul; 99(1 Suppl):91-7. PubMed ID: 12859067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine.
    Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Schaefer J; Scholz M; Ludwig K; Khodadadyan-Klostermann C; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jul; 29(13):1413-9. PubMed ID: 15223931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Pflugmacher R; Schleicher P; Gumnior S; Turan O; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Aug; 29(16):1717-22. PubMed ID: 15303013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Expandable cages: biomechanical comparison of different cages for ventral spondylodesis in the thoracolumbar spine].
    Khodadadyan-Klostermann C; Schaefer J; Schleicher P; Pflugmacher R; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Kandziora F
    Chirurg; 2004 Jul; 75(7):694-701. PubMed ID: 15258751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of cage design on interbody fusion in a sheep cervical spine model.
    Kandziora F; Schollmeier G; Scholz M; Schaefer J; Scholz A; Schmidmaier G; Schröder R; Bail H; Duda G; Mittlmeier T; Haas NP
    J Neurosurg; 2002 Apr; 96(3 Suppl):321-32. PubMed ID: 11990842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Eindorf T; Schnake KJ; Haas NP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Sep; 29(17):1845-55; discussion 1856. PubMed ID: 15534403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of bioabsorbable multiamino acid copolymer/α-tri-calcium phosphate interbody fusion cages in a goat model.
    Chunguang Z; Yueming S; Chongqi T; Hong D; Fuxing P; Yonggang Y; Hong L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1615-22. PubMed ID: 21270683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional motion analysis with Synex. Comparative biomechanical test series with a new vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine.
    Knop C; Lange U; Bastian L; Blauth M
    Eur Spine J; 2000 Dec; 9(6):472-85. PubMed ID: 11189915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical testing of the lumbar facet interference screw.
    Kandziora F; Schleicher P; Scholz M; Pflugmacher R; Eindorf T; Haas NP; Pavlov PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(2):E34-9. PubMed ID: 15644745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A biomechanical comparison of modern anterior and posterior plate fixation of the cervical spine.
    Do Koh Y; Lim TH; Won You J; Eck J; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11148640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
    Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Biomechanical evaluation of immediate stability of biodegradable multi-amino acid copolymer/tri-calcium phosphate composite interbody Cages in a goat cervical spine model].
    Zhou C; Song Y; Tu C; Duan H; Pei F; Yan Y; Li H
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 28(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 21485185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconstruction of Segmental Stability of Goat Cervical Spine with Poly (D, L-lactic acid) Cage.
    Li XH; Song YM; Duan H
    Orthop Surg; 2015 Aug; 7(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 26311103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical stability of a bioabsorbable self-retaining polylactic acid/nano-sized β-tricalcium phosphate cervical spine interbody fusion device in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion sheep models.
    Cao L; Duan PG; Li XL; Yuan FL; Zhao MD; Che W; Wang HR; Dong J
    Int J Nanomedicine; 2012; 7():5875-80. PubMed ID: 23226018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.