349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12859105)
1. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by non-contact air puff versus Goldmann applanation tonometers in gas-filled vitrectomized eyes.
Patikulsila D; Taweemankongsab S; Ngamtipakorn S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 May; 86(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 12859105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intraoperative assessment of intraocular pressure in vitrectomized air-filled and fluid-filled eyes.
Moon CH; Choi KS; Rhee MR; Lee SJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 91(7):e524-8. PubMed ID: 23710577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.
Sandhu SS; Chattopadhyay S; Amariotakis GA; Skarmoutsos F; Birch MK; Ray-Chaudhuri N
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pascal dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry in gas and air-filled eyes after vitrectomy surgery.
Donaldson MJ; Bhatnagar P; Dhrami-Gavazi E; Santos RA; Barile GR; Del Priore LV; Iranmanesh R; Schiff WM; Chang S
Retina; 2009 Apr; 29(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 18936717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
Schlote T; Landenberger H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tonometry in normal and scarred corneas, and in postkeratoplasty eyes: a comparative study of the Goldmann, the ProTon and the Schiotz tonometers.
Jain AK; Saini JS; Gupta R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Mar; 48(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11271930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry--a comparative study.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Lindén C
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 18093261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Reproducibility of dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison with TonoPenXL and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study on 323 normal eyes].
Viestenz A; Langenbucher A; Viestenz A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Oct; 223(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17063423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
Rehnman JB; Martin L
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 18565094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A new site-independent tonometer (ProTon) in comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Gräf M; Wassill H; Dick B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Apr; 206(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 7791286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G
Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
