349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12859105)
21. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Yücel AA; Stürmer J; Gloor B
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of a new Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Egli M; Goldblum D; Kipfer A; Rohrer K; Tappeiner C; Abegg M; Berger L; Schoetzau A; Iliev ME
Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 96(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 21464035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer].
Müller A; Godenschweger L; Lang GE; Kampmeier J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Sep; 221(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 15459844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [The American Optical non-contact tonometer and its results compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (author's transl)].
Derka H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1980 Nov; 177(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 7253520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Jorge J; Fernandes P; Queirós A; Ribeiro P; Garcês C; Gonzalez-Meijome JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 20444114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry After Vitrectomy.
Mamas N; Fuest M; Koutsonas A; Roessler G; Mazinani BE; Walter P; Plange N
J Glaucoma; 2016 Aug; 25(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 26950584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.
Lawson-Kopp W; DeJong A; Yudcovitch L; Williams S; Kohl P; Yolton RL
Optometry; 2002 Feb; 73(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 12365714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Salim S; Du H; Wan J
J Glaucoma; 2013; 22(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 23542696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
Bochmann F; Kaufmann C; Becht C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 19384775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.
Goldich Y; Barkana Y; Avni I; Zadok D
Cornea; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1011-5. PubMed ID: 20539214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
