These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12859124)

  • 1. When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants.
    Thiessen ED; Saffran JR
    Dev Psychol; 2003 Jul; 39(4):706-16. PubMed ID: 12859124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. At 11 months, prosody still outranks statistics.
    Johnson EK; Seidl AH
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):131-41. PubMed ID: 19120421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infants' sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation.
    Jusczyk PW; Hohne EA; Bauman A
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1465-76. PubMed ID: 10598463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Infants' statistical word segmentation in an artificial language is linked to both parental speech input and reported production abilities.
    Hoareau M; Yeung HH; Nazzi T
    Dev Sci; 2019 Jul; 22(4):e12803. PubMed ID: 30681753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One language or two? Navigating cross-language conflict in statistical word segmentation.
    Antovich DM; Graf Estes K
    Dev Sci; 2020 Nov; 23(6):e12960. PubMed ID: 32145042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral tilt as a cue to word segmentation in infancy and adulthood.
    Thiessen ED; Saffran JR
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jul; 66(5):779-91. PubMed ID: 15495903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Connecting cues: overlapping regularities support cue discovery in infancy.
    Sahni SD; Seidenberg MS; Saffran JR
    Child Dev; 2010; 81(3):727-36. PubMed ID: 20573101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual language statistical word segmentation in infancy: Simulating a language-mixing bilingual environment.
    Tsui ASM; Erickson LC; Mallikarjunn A; Thiessen ED; Fennell CT
    Dev Sci; 2021 May; 24(3):e13050. PubMed ID: 33063938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns?
    Mattys SL; Jusczyk PW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):644-55. PubMed ID: 11424651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between statistical and semantic information in infant language development.
    Lany J; Saffran JR
    Dev Sci; 2011 Sep; 14(5):1207-19. PubMed ID: 21884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental Differences Between Children and Adults in the Use of Visual Cues for Segmentation.
    Lavi-Rotbain O; Arnon I
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42 Suppl 2():606-620. PubMed ID: 28960506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.
    Yeung HH; Werker JF
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19765698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults.
    Männel C; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-adjacent dependency learning in infancy, and its link to language development.
    Frost RLA; Jessop A; Durrant S; Peter MS; Bidgood A; Pine JM; Rowland CF; Monaghan P
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Aug; 120():101291. PubMed ID: 32197131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the "anchor word" effect in infants: Segmentation and categorisation of speech with and without high frequency words.
    Frost RLA; Dunn K; Christiansen MH; Gómez RL; Monaghan P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243436. PubMed ID: 33332419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do infants perceive word boundaries? An empirical study of the bootstrapping of lexical acquisition.
    Christophe A; Dupoux E; Bertoncini J; Mehler J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1570-80. PubMed ID: 8176060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early Speech Segmentation in French-learning Infants: Monosyllabic Words versus Embedded Syllables.
    Nishibayashi LL; Goyet L; Nazzi T
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):334-50. PubMed ID: 26529900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.