265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12861170)
1. External cephalic version beginning at 34 weeks' gestation versus 37 weeks' gestation: a randomized multicenter trial.
Hutton EK; Kaufman K; Hodnett E; Amankwah K; Hewson SA; McKay D; Szalai JP; Hannah ME
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jul; 189(1):245-54. PubMed ID: 12861170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.
Hutton EK; Hofmeyr GJ; Dowswell T
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; 2015(7):CD000084. PubMed ID: 26222245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term.
Hutton EK; Hofmeyr GJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jan; (1):CD000084. PubMed ID: 16437421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Ross SJ; Delisle MF; Carson GD; Windrim R; Ohlsson A; Willan AR; Gafni A; Sylvestre G; Natale R; Barrett Y; Pollard JK; Dunn MS; Turtle P;
BJOG; 2011 Apr; 118(5):564-77. PubMed ID: 21291506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.
De Castro H; Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):248-256. PubMed ID: 31671470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners.
Hutton EK; Hannah ME; Barrett J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2002 Oct; 24(10):804-10. PubMed ID: 12399807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
Hofmeyr GJ; Kulier R; West HM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 2015(4):CD000083. PubMed ID: 25828903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
Hofmeyr GJ; Kulier R
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD000083. PubMed ID: 23076883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - External Cephalic Version and other Interventions to turn Breech Babies to Cephalic Presentation].
Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 31678503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses.
Hutton EK; Simioni JC; Thabane L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28449212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uptake of external cephalic version for term breech presentation: an Australian population study, 2002-2012.
Bin YS; Roberts CL; Nicholl MC; Ford JB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):244. PubMed ID: 28747173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Success rates of early versus late initiation of external cephalic version.
Lavie A; Reicher L; Avraham S; Ram M; Maslovitz S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Apr; 145(1):116-121. PubMed ID: 30706464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. External cephalic version at term with tocolysis and vibroacoustic stimulation.
Annapoorna V; Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Chua S; Montan S; Ratnam SS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Oct; 59(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9359440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].
Kuppens SM; Francois AM; Hasaart TH; van der Donk MW; Pop VJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A63. PubMed ID: 20132565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Cost Implications in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia of Early Versus Delayed External Cephalic Version in the Early External Cephalic Version 2 (EECV2) Trial.
Ahmed RJ; Gafni A; Hutton EK;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Mar; 38(3):235-245.e3. PubMed ID: 27106193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An observational study of the success and complications of 2546 external cephalic versions in low-risk pregnant women performed by trained midwives.
Beuckens A; Rijnders M; Verburgt-Doeleman GH; Rijninks-van Driel GC; Thorpe J; Hutton EK
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 25639281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks' gestation without tocolysis.
Impey L; Lissoni D
J Matern Fetal Med; 1999; 8(5):203-7. PubMed ID: 10475501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
