265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12861170)
21. Usefulness of atosiban for tocolysis during external cephalic version: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Riemma G; Schiattarella A; La Verde M; Cianci S; Savoia F; De Franciscis P; Cobellis L; Colacurci N; Morlando M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Mar; 258():86-92. PubMed ID: 33421816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor - a matched controlled study.
Boujenah J; Fleury C; Bonneau C; Pharisien I; Tigaizin A; Carbillon L
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Dec; 46(10):737-742. PubMed ID: 28951278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. External cephalic version at 38 weeks' gestation at a specialized German single center.
Zielbauer AS; Louwen F; Jennewein L
PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0252702. PubMed ID: 34460836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?
Kuppens SM; Smailbegovic I; Houterman S; de Leeuw I; Hasaart TH
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):363. PubMed ID: 29041923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term.
Ezra Y; Elram T; Plotkin V; Elchalal U
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2000 May; 90(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 10767512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Atosiban versus fenoterol as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: randomised controlled trial.
Velzel J; Vlemmix F; Opmeer BC; Molkenboer JF; Verhoeven CJ; van Pampus MG; Papatsonis DN; Bais JM; Vollebregt KC; van der Esch L; Van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6773. PubMed ID: 28126898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.
Reicher L; Lavie A; Fouks Y; Isakov O; Attali E; Yogev Y; Maslovitz S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):911-916. PubMed ID: 33025088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An alternative to cesarean: a description of external cephalic version in noncephalic presenting twin.
Staat BC; Shields A; Eubanks AA; Wenckus D; Ore RM; Crosiar J; Fausett MB
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jan; 34(2):177-181. PubMed ID: 30983438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section: a series of 38 cases.
de Meeus JB; Ellia F; Magnin G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Oct; 81(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 9846717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcome of external cephalic version: our experience.
Teoh T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1996 Aug; 22(4):389-94. PubMed ID: 8870425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis.
Zeck W; Walcher W; Lang U
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2008; 66(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 18230911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. External cephalic version with tocolysis. Observations and continuing experience at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center.
Wallace RL; VanDorsten JP; Eglinton GS; Meuller E; McCart D; Schifrin BS
J Reprod Med; 1984 Oct; 29(10):745-8. PubMed ID: 6150997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.
Ben-Arie A; Kogan S; Schachter M; Hagay ZJ; Insler V
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Dec; 63(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8903766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical outcomes after external cephalic version with spinal anesthesia after failure of a first attempt without anesthesia.
Massalha M; Garmi G; Zafran N; Carmeli J; Gimburg G; Salim R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 139(3):324-328. PubMed ID: 28842977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Late preterm versus term external cephalic version: an audit of a single obstetrician experience.
Levin G; Rottenstreich A; Weill Y; Pollack RN
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Oct; 300(4):875-880. PubMed ID: 31312960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Successful but limited use of external cephalic version in Auckland.
Wise MR; Sadler L; Ansell D
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 19032661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Matched cohort study of external cephalic version in women with previous cesarean delivery.
Keepanasseril A; Anand K; Soundara Raghavan S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jul; 138(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 28380246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Delivery mode and neonatal outcome after a trial of external cephalic version (ECV): a prospective trial of vaginal breech versus cephalic delivery.
Reinhard J; Sänger N; Hanker L; Reichenbach L; Yuan J; Herrmann E; Louwen F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):663-8. PubMed ID: 23183715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome between 47 Deliveries Following Successful External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation and 7456 Deliveries Following Spontaneous Cephalic Presentation.
de Gregorio N; Friedl T; Schramm A; Reister F; Janni W; Ebner F
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(5):477-481. PubMed ID: 28848185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
