193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12861602)
21. Bone integration capability of a series of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite coatings formed by micro-arc oxidation.
Yan J; Sun JF; Chu PK; Han Y; Zhang YM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Sep; 101(9):2465-80. PubMed ID: 23348908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Osseointegration evaluation of laser-deposited titanium dioxide nanoparticles on commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Azzawi ZGM; Hamad TI; Kadhim SA; Naji GA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Jun; 29(7):96. PubMed ID: 29946975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The effect of ultraviolet-C irradiation via a bactericidal ultraviolet sterilizer on an anodized titanium implant: a study in rabbits.
Park KH; Koak JY; Kim SK; Han CH; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23377048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surface characteristics and structure of anodic oxide films containing Ca and P on a titanium implant material.
Zhu X; Ong JL; Kim S; Kim K
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 May; 60(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 11857441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating.
Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Byon E; Albrektsson T
Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6720-30. PubMed ID: 15975649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A mechanical evaluation of TiO2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: Part 1.
Vercaigne S; Wolke JG; Naert I; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Aug; 11(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 11168223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of calcium ion incorporation on bone healing of Ti6Al4V alloy implants in rabbit tibiae.
Park JW; Park KB; Suh JY
Biomaterials; 2007 Aug; 28(22):3306-13. PubMed ID: 17462729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of surface roughness and calcium phosphate coating on the implant/bone response.
Hayakawa T; Yoshinari M; Nemoto K; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Aug; 11(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 11168222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite].
Yan J; Zhang YM; Han Y; Zhao YT; Sun JF; Yan H
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 45(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 20368002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro- and nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit.
Palmquist A; Emanuelsson L; Brånemark R; Thomsen P
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2011 May; 97(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 21394900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Anodization: a promising nano-modification technique of titanium implants for orthopedic applications.
Yao C; Webster TJ
J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2006; 6(9-10):2682-92. PubMed ID: 17048475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bone response to endosseous titanium implants surface-modified by blasting and chemical treatment: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Jang IS; Suh JY
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2008 Feb; 84(2):400-7. PubMed ID: 17595031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines.
Pura JA; Bobyn JD; Tanzer M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 May; 474(5):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26831478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bone response to calcium phosphate-coated and bisphosphonate-immobilized titanium implants.
Yoshinari M; Oda Y; Inoue T; Matsuzaka K; Shimono M
Biomaterials; 2002 Jul; 23(14):2879-85. PubMed ID: 12069328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of removal torques for laser-treated titanium implants with anodized implants.
Kang SH; Cho SA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1491-5. PubMed ID: 21778844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
