103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12861655)
1. [The LSP test for determining oscillation resistance of spinal implants].
Schuh A; Lorenz S; Holzwarth U
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2003 Jun; 48(6):162-5. PubMed ID: 12861655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Notch sensitivity of titanium alloy, commercially pure titanium, and stainless steel spinal implants.
Dick JC; Bourgeault CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Aug; 26(15):1668-72. PubMed ID: 11474353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs.
Gornet MF; Chan FW; Coleman JC; Murrell B; Nockels RP; Taylor BA; Lanman TH; Ochoa JA
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081009. PubMed ID: 21950902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of stainless steel and CP titanium rods for the anterior instrumentation of scoliosis.
Haher T; Ottaviano D; Lapman P; Goldfarb B; Merola A; Valdevit A
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 14757955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Titanium as an implant material for rods of transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine].
von Knoch M; Saxler G; Quint U
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):132-6. PubMed ID: 15212198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Would CoCr rods provide better correctional forces than stainless steel or titanium for rigid scoliosis curves?
Serhan H; Mhatre D; Newton P; Giorgio P; Sturm P
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):E70-4. PubMed ID: 22832558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of polyaryletherketone rod composites and titanium rods for posterior lumbosacral instrumentation. Presented at the 2010 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Laboratory investigation.
Bruner HJ; Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Maiman DJ; Slivka MA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):766-72. PubMed ID: 21121756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study.
Koller H; Fierlbeck J; Auffarth A; Niederberger A; Stephan D; Hitzl W; Augat P; Zenner J; Blocher M; Blocher M; Resch H; Mayer M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E390-8. PubMed ID: 24384666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model.
Wedemeyer M; Parent S; Mahar A; Odell T; Swimmer T; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17202891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength.
Lindsey C; Deviren V; Xu Z; Yeh RF; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1680-7. PubMed ID: 16816763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Residual particle free surfaces after shot peening in modular hip arthroplasty are feasible].
Schuh A; Uter W; Holzwarth U; Kachler W; Göske J; Raab B; Mayerhöfer T
Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Dec; 130(6):576-9. PubMed ID: 16382407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicycle mechanical performance of titanium and stainless steel transpedicular spine implants.
Pienkowski D; Stephens GC; Doers TM; Hamilton DM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):782-8. PubMed ID: 9563108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative analysis of international standards for the fatigue testing of posterior spinal fixation systems: the importance of preload in ISO 12189.
La Barbera L; Ottardi C; Villa T
Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2290-6. PubMed ID: 26235467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the suitability of biodegradable rods for use in posterior lumbar fusion: An in-vitro biomechanical evaluation and finite element analysis.
Tsuang FY; Hsieh YY; Kuo YJ; Chen CH; Lin FH; Chen CS; Chiang CJ
PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188034. PubMed ID: 29145437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical stability according to different configurations of screws and rods.
Ha KY; Hwang SC; Whang TH
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 May; 26(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 22105105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The fatigue life of contoured cobalt chrome posterior spinal fusion rods.
Nguyen TQ; Buckley JM; Ames C; Deviren V
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Feb; 225(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 21428153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Material failure in dynamic spine implants: are the standardized implant tests before market launch sufficient?
Oikonomidis S; Sobottke R; Wilke HJ; Herren C; Beckmann A; Zarghooni K; Siewe J
Eur Spine J; 2019 Apr; 28(4):872-882. PubMed ID: 30649613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced osteoblast proliferation and corrosion resistance of commercially pure titanium through surface nanostructuring by ultrasonic shot peening and stress relieving.
Jindal S; Bansal R; Singh BP; Pandey R; Narayanan S; Wani MR; Singh V
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jul; 40 Spec No():347-55. PubMed ID: 25020216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical testing of a flexible fixation device for the lumbar spine.
Leahy JC; Mathias KJ; Hukins DW; Shepherd DE; Deans WF
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 11109856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
