139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12861846)
1. Scratch-patch and patch testing in drug allergy--an assessment of specificity.
Hug K; Yawalkar N; Helbling A; Pichler WJ
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2003; 13(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12861846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical usefulness of patch and challenge tests in the diagnosis of cell-mediated allergy to betalactams.
Patriarca G; D'Ambrosio C; Schiavino D; Larocca LM; Nucera E; Milani A
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 Sep; 83(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 10507273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive patch test reactions to celecoxib may be due to irritation and do not correlate with the results of oral provocation.
Kleinhans M; Linzbach L; Zedlitz S; Kaufmann R; Boehncke WH
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Aug; 47(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 12423408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Non-irritant concentrations and amounts of active ingredient in drug patch tests.
Brajon D; Menetre S; Waton J; Poreaux C; Barbaud A
Contact Dermatitis; 2014 Sep; 71(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 24981708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Late reactions to the patch-test preparations para-phenylenediamine and epoxy resin: a prospective multicentre investigation of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.
Hillen U; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Becker D; Brasch J; Lilie M; Fuchs T; Kreft B; Pirker C; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 16536809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of patch tests for diagnosing selective allergy to captopril.
Gaig P; San Miguel-Moncin MM; Bartra J; Bonet A; García-Ortega P
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2001; 11(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 11831455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of patch testing for the diagnosis of abacavir-related hypersensitivity reaction in HIV patients.
Giorgini S; Martinelli C; Tognetti L; Carocci A; Giuntini R; Mastronardi V; Torricelli F; Leoncini F; Lotti T
Dermatol Ther; 2011; 24(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 22515676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Skin tests for diagnostics of allergic immediate-type reactions. Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology].
Ruëff F; Bergmann KC; Brockow K; Fuchs T; Grübl A; Jung K; Klimek L; Müsken H; Pfaar O; Przybilla B; Sitter H; Wehrmann W;
Pneumologie; 2011 Aug; 65(8):484-95. PubMed ID: 21830178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in methyldibromo glutaronitrile-sensitive patients.
Schnuch A; Kelterer D; Bauer A; Schuster Ch; Aberer W; Mahler V; Katzer K; Rakoski J; Jappe U; Krautheim A; Bircher A; Koch P; Worm M; Löffler H; Hillen U; Frosch PJ; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 15859992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patch testing in drug allergy.
Friedmann PS; Ardern-Jones M
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2010 Aug; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20485160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodine preparations: a conundrum.
Lee SK; Zhai H; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):184-7. PubMed ID: 15859989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin testing in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media - a European multicenter study.
Brockow K; Romano A; Aberer W; Bircher AJ; Barbaud A; Bonadonna P; Faria E; Kanny G; Lerch M; Pichler WJ; Ring J; Rodrigues Cernadas J; Tomaz E; Demoly P; Christiansen C;
Allergy; 2009 Feb; 64(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 19178403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance.
Färm G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atopy patch test in the diagnosis of food allergy in children with atopic eczema dermatitis syndrome.
Cudowska B; Kaczmarski M
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2005; 50():261-7. PubMed ID: 16358980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Drug patch testing in systemic cutaneous drug allergy.
Barbaud A
Toxicology; 2005 Apr; 209(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 15767038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of patch tests in clindamycin-related drug eruptions.
Pereira N; Canelas MM; Santiago F; Brites MM; Gonçalo M
Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Oct; 65(4):202-7. PubMed ID: 21689110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of intradermal test and patch test in the diagnosis of nonimmediate reactions to metamizol.
Macías E; Ruiz A; Moreno E; Laffond E; Dávila I; Lorente F
Allergy; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1462-4. PubMed ID: 17983381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anticonvulsant drug hypersensitivity.
Galindo PA; Borja J; Gómez E; Mur P; Gudín M; García R; Encinas C; Romero G; Garrido JA; Cortina P; Feo F
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2002; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 12926190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. T cell-mediated reactions to iodinated contrast media: evaluation by skin and lymphocyte activation tests.
Kanny G; Pichler W; Morisset M; Franck P; Marie B; Kohler C; Renaudin JM; Beaudouin E; Laudy JS; Moneret-Vautrin DA
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2005 Jan; 115(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 15637566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
