These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12861884)

  • 1. Simplifying single-stage solid abutments: Part 1. Impressions.
    Schneider AL; Kurtzman GM
    Implant Dent; 2003; 12(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 12861884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alternative technique for the accurate transfer of periimplant soft tissue contour.
    Man Y; Qu Y; Dam HG; Gong P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 23395340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y; Pasciuta M; Finger IM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB; Hong HH; Tsai TP; Shen YF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simplifying single-stage solid abutments: techniques for impressioning and temporization.
    Schneider AL; Kurtzman GM
    Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):114-7. PubMed ID: 15559462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Impression technics in implantology].
    Vanheusden A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):189-203. PubMed ID: 16193852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A technique to transfer the contours of an interim implant restoration to the definitive cast.
    Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 25799285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
    Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A; Ortorp A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of prefabricated titanium abutments and customized anatomic lithium disilicate structures for cement-retained implant restorations in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Zandinejad A; Martin WC; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 24360007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Technique to Transfer the Emergence Profile Contours of a Provisional Implant Crown to the Definitive Impression.
    Shah K; Yilmaz B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):e15-7. PubMed ID: 27004296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD; Nicholls JI; Yuodelis RA; Brudvik JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simplified impression technique for implant-supported crowns.
    Haubenreich JE; Robinson FG
    Dent Clin North Am; 2006 Jul; 50(3):439-49, vii. PubMed ID: 16818025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of 2 impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of working implant prosthesis models: an in vitro study.
    Calesini G; Zarone F; Sorrentino R; Micarelli C; Fabianelli A; Papacchini F; Gherlone E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):822-7. PubMed ID: 24820709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benefits of the dual-arch impression technique. Accurate impressions and fewer than 1% remakes.
    Abrams SH
    Dent Today; 2002 Jul; 21(7):56-9. PubMed ID: 12242834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy.
    Akalin ZF; Ozkan YK; Ekerim A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23377060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The "first implant": protocol for the GP, Part 3.
    Tischler M; Ganz SD
    Dent Today; 2011 Dec; 30(12):64, 66, 68-9. PubMed ID: 22324106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.