256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12861989)
1. California's new law allowing surrogate consent for clinical research involving subjects with impaired decision-making capacity.
Luce JM
Intensive Care Med; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1024-5. PubMed ID: 12861989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An act concerning consent to research--protection of decisionally incapacitated individuals (Draft, August 1, 1997).
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):282-300. PubMed ID: 15573440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulating research involving adults who lack decision making capacity.
Fleischman AR
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2001; 64(2):12-7. PubMed ID: 12517081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Regulating research with vulnerable populations: litigation gone awry.
Oldham JM; Haimowitz S; Delano SJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 15573435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent for medication in persons with mental retardation and mental illness.
O'Sullivan JL; Borcherding BG
Health Matrix Clevel; 2002; 12(1):63-92. PubMed ID: 12013701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State court says informed consent procedures were unacceptable.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 May; 15(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent to clinical decisions when capacity is absent. Part 1: Making decisions.
Nazarko L
Nurs Manag (Harrow); 2004 Mar; 10(10):18-22. PubMed ID: 15038301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Oyebode F
Clin Med (Lond); 2006; 6(2):130-1. PubMed ID: 16688966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A survey of researchers using a consent policy for cognitively impaired human research subjects.
Candilis PJ; Wesley RW; Wichman A
IRB; 1993; 15(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Proxy consent to participation of the decisionally impaired in medical resesarch--Maryland's policy initiative.
Hoffman DE; Schwartz J
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):123-53. PubMed ID: 15573434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mental competence, caregivers, and the process of consent: research involving Alzheimer's patients or others with decreasing mental capacity.
Guinn DE
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2002; 11(3):230-45. PubMed ID: 12082904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical research and involuntary mental health patients: implications of proposed changes to legislation in Victoria.
Gillam L; Weedon K
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2005 Oct; 24(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 16459430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of Force for Medical Purposes--A Danish Perspective.
Adolphsen C; Naur E
Eur J Health Law; 2015 Sep; 22(4):359-81. PubMed ID: 26427273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research regulations on subjects' "capacity to give consent" were unconstitutional.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jun; 15(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11917940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent.
Wisk TM
Plast Surg Nurs; 2007; 27(4):206-9. PubMed ID: 18165729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Proxy decision making in Alzheimer disease research: durable powers of attorney, guardianship, and other alternatives.
Kapp MB
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord; 1994; 8(Suppl. 4):28-37. PubMed ID: 11657671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Research oversight and adults with cognitive impairment.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(6):9-10. PubMed ID: 14983552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The bane of surrogate decision-making: defining the best interests of never-competent persons.
Cantor NL
J Leg Med; 2005 Jun; 26(2):155-205. PubMed ID: 16036812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The precarious role of the courts: surrogate health care decisionmaking.
Fader JF
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1193-219. PubMed ID: 12599351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
