These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12865377)

  • 1. Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study.
    McWilliams R; Hoover-Fong J; Hamosh A; Beck S; Beaty T; Cutting G
    JAMA; 2003 Jul; 290(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 12865377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Institutional review board variability in minimal-risk multicenter urogynecology studies.
    Harvie HS; Lowenstein L; Omotosho TB; Sanses T; Molden S; Hardy J; Brubaker L;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 22453318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol.
    Mansbach J; Acholonu U; Clark S; Camargo CA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Apr; 14(4):377-80. PubMed ID: 17312334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of multicenter studies by multiple institutional review boards: characteristics and outcomes for perinatal studies implemented by a multicenter network.
    Abramovici A; Salazar A; Edvalson T; Gallagher N; Dorman K; Tita A;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 212(1):110.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations in institutional review board reviews of a multi-center, Emergency Department (ED)-based genetic research protocol.
    Lee DC; Peak DA; Jones JS; Domeier RM; Hendry PL; Rathlev NK; Swor RA; McLean SA
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jun; 31(6):967-9. PubMed ID: 23623236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard protocol for a multicenter clinical trial.
    Stair TO; Reed CR; Radeos MS; Koski G; Camargo CA;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2001 Jun; 8(6):636-41. PubMed ID: 11388939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval.
    Greene SM; Geiger AM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):784-90. PubMed ID: 16828670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature.
    Check DK; Weinfurt KP; Dombeck CB; Kramer JM; Flynn KE
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 23666951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability in IRBs regarding parental acceptance of passive consent.
    Higgerson RA; Olsho LE; Christie LM; Rehder K; Doksum T; Gedeit R; Giuliano JS; Brennan B; Wendlandt R; Randolph AG;
    Pediatrics; 2014 Aug; 134(2):e496-503. PubMed ID: 25002659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in standards of research compensation and child assent practices: a comparison of 69 institutional review board-approved informed permission and assent forms for 3 multicenter pediatric clinical trials.
    Kimberly MB; Hoehn KS; Feudtner C; Nelson RM; Schreiner M
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):1706-11. PubMed ID: 16651328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in local institutional review board evaluations of a multicenter patient safety study.
    Thompson DA; Kass N; Holzmueller C; Marsteller JA; Martinez EA; Gurses AP; Kanchuger M; Schwann N; Gibson CS; Bauer L; Pronovost PJ
    J Healthc Qual; 2012; 34(4):33-9. PubMed ID: 22060010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variability among institutional review boards' decisions within the context of a multicenter trial.
    Silverman H; Hull SC; Sugarman J
    Crit Care Med; 2001 Feb; 29(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 11246299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards.
    Burman WJ; Reves RR; Cohn DL; Schooley RT
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Jan; 134(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 11177319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approaches to facilitate institutional review board approval of multicenter research studies.
    Marsolo K
    Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S77-81. PubMed ID: 22692264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.
    Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Mechaber AJ; Eacker A; Harper W; Massie FS; Power DV; Shanafelt TD
    Acad Med; 2007 Jul; 82(7):654-60. PubMed ID: 17595560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn.
    Abbott L; Grady C
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Mar; 6(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 21460582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Duration and variation of the ethics approval process in Germany - an example from a non-interventional study with 44 participating centers].
    Eichler M; Schmitt J; Schuler MK
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2019 Oct; 146():15-20. PubMed ID: 31473073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local vs central institutional review boards for multicenter studies.
    Rosé CD
    JAMA; 2003 Oct; 290(16):2126; author reply 2126-7. PubMed ID: 14570946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.