These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12866526)

  • 1. The conjoined twins of Malta: direct or indirect killing?
    Guevin B
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 12866526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Was Mary's death murder?
    Uniacke S
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):208-20. PubMed ID: 14696613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conjoined twins: separation as mutilation.
    Watt H
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 14696615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human beings, persons and conjoined twins: an ethical analysis of the judgement in Re A.
    Harris J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):221-36. PubMed ID: 14696614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Did the principle of double effect justify the separation?
    Therrien M
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):417-27. PubMed ID: 12866529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'On the sharpest horns of a dilemma': Re A (conjoined twins).
    Sheldon S; Wilkinson S
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 14696612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Murder by design: the 'feel-good factor' and the criminal law.
    McEwan J
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):246-58. PubMed ID: 14696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conjoined twins: the ambiguity of double effect reasoning.
    Suziedelis AK
    Med Etika Bioet; 2001; 8(3-4):3-5. PubMed ID: 16285152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Jodie" and "Mary": separating the Maltese twins.
    May WE
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(3):407-16. PubMed ID: 12866527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conjoined twins: the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part two.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (147):89-113. PubMed ID: 12715812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conjoined twins of Malta: a survey of Catholic opinion.
    Latkovic MS; Nelson TA
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(4):585-614. PubMed ID: 12854552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The tragic case of Jodie and Mary: questions about separating conjoined twins.
    Kaczor C
    Linacre Q; 2003 May; 70(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 14696628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conjoined twins : the limits of reason and the transcendent hope--part one.
    Phang A
    Law Justice; 2001; (146):38-56. PubMed ID: 12962087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Maltese conjoined twins.
    Gormally L
    Second Opin (Chic); 2001 Oct; (8):36-52. PubMed ID: 16025644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Killing off Mary: was the Court of Appeal right?
    Hewson B
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(3):281-98. PubMed ID: 14696618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The case of the British conjoined twins.
    Bleich JD
    Tradition; 2000; 34(4):61-78. PubMed ID: 14696602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation).
    Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 2000; 4():961-1070. PubMed ID: 15069933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Killing Mary to save Jodie: conjoined twins and individual rights.
    Wasserman D
    Philos Public Policy Q; 2001; 21(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12705248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Maltese twins case.
    Wechter D
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(4):485. PubMed ID: 12854560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Jodie and Mary, conjoined twins: a case of judicial moral hubris?
    Gillon R
    Med Leg J; 2004; 72(Pt 1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15038316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.