These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. Tuan KM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Apr; 32(4):577-83. PubMed ID: 16698475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of expanding the treatment zone of the Nidek EC-5000 laser on laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. Macsai MS; Stubbe K; Beck AP; Ravage ZB J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Nov; 30(11):2336-43. PubMed ID: 15519085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia. Schallhorn SC; Tanzer DJ; Kaupp SE; Brown M; Malady SE Ophthalmology; 2009 Apr; 116(4):702-9. PubMed ID: 19344822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Pop M; Payette Y Ophthalmology; 2004 Jan; 111(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 14711706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A control-matched comparison of laser epithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia. Tobaigy FM; Ghanem RC; Sayegh RR; Hallak JA; Azar DT Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 142(6):901-8. PubMed ID: 17157575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glare sensitivity and optical side effects 1 year after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Neeracher B; Senn P; Schipper I J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Aug; 30(8):1696-701. PubMed ID: 15313292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of environmental factors on myopic LASIK enhancement rates. Walter KA; Stevenson AW J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4):798-803. PubMed ID: 15093641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic dry eye and regression after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Albietz JM; Lenton LM; McLennan SG J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Mar; 30(3):675-84. PubMed ID: 15050267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Topographic and biomechanical differences between hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Qazi MA; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Pepose JS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 15721696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An interval-censored model for predicting myopic regression after laser in situ keratomileusis. Chen YI; Chien KL; Wang IJ; Yen AM; Chen LS; Lin PJ; Chen TH Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 48(8):3516-23. PubMed ID: 17652718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of depressive symptoms in patient satisfaction with visual quality after laser in situ keratomileusis. Morse JS; Schallhorn SC; Hettinger K; Tanzer D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Feb; 35(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 19185253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The incidence and risk factors for developing dry eye after myopic LASIK. De Paiva CS; Chen Z; Koch DD; Hamill MB; Manuel FK; Hassan SS; Wilhelmus KR; Pflugfelder SC Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 16490488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A predictive model for postoperative intraocular pressure among patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Yang CC; Wang IJ; Chang YC; Lin LL; Chen TH Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 141(3):530-536. PubMed ID: 16490501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of rainbow glare after laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a 60 kHz femtosecond laser. Bamba S; Rocha KM; Ramos-Esteban JC; Krueger RR J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1082-6. PubMed ID: 19465295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual field changes after laser in situ keratomileusis in myopic eyes. Ozdamar A; Küçüksümer Y; Aras C; Akova N; Ustundag C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 May; 30(5):1020-3. PubMed ID: 15130638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]