209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12867894)
1. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, Part 2. Results and conclusions.
Voudouris JC; Woodside DG; Altuna G; Angelopoulos G; Bourque PJ; Lacouture CY; Kuftinec MM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):13-29. PubMed ID: 12867894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during herbst treatment, part 1. New technological methods.
Voudouris JC; Woodside DG; Altuna G; Kuftinec MM; Angelopoulos G; Bourque PJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jun; 123(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 12806337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity.
Voudouris JC; Kuftinec MM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):247-66. PubMed ID: 10715086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):375-88. PubMed ID: 9753819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Amount and direction of temporomandibular joint growth changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation.
Pancherz H; Fischer S
Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 14580015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation.
Ruf S; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jun; 115(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 10358242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study.
Baltromejus S; Ruf S; Pancherz H
Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):627-37. PubMed ID: 12512780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
Serbesis-Tsarudis C; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temporomandibular joint growth changes in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent Herbst subjects. A long-term roentgenographic cephalometric study.
Pancherz H; Michailidou C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):153-61; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling.
Woodside DG; Metaxas A; Altuna G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Sep; 92(3):181-98. PubMed ID: 3477085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients treated with the Herbst appliance: a pilot study.
LeCornu M; Cevidanes LH; Zhu H; Wu CD; Larson B; Nguyen T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):818-30. PubMed ID: 24286905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study.
Aras A; Ada E; Saracoğlu H; Gezer NS; Aras I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions.
Vargervik K; Harvold EP
Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):242-51. PubMed ID: 3862347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed functional orthopaedic appliances on the condyle-fossa relationship in the temporomandibular joint: a magnetic resonance imaging study (Part I).
Kinzinger GS; Roth A; Gülden N; Bücker A; Diedrich PR
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Sep; 35(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 16940482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. "Effective condylar growth" and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study.
Pancherz H; Ruf S; Kohlhas P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Oct; 114(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 9790329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The control of condylar growth: an experimental evaluation of the role of the lateral pterygoid muscle.
Whetten LL; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod; 1985 Sep; 88(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 3862341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positional and morphologic changes of the mandibular condyle after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in skeletal class II patients.
Azumi Y; Sugawara J; Takahashi I; Mitani H; Nagasaka H; Kawamura H
World J Orthod; 2004; 5(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 15615140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of the leaf gauge and anterior jig on jaw muscle electromyography and condylar head displacement: a pilot study.
Santosa RE; Azizi M; Whittle T; Wanigaratrne K; Klineberg IJ
Aust Dent J; 2006 Mar; 51(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 16669475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
