These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12867904)

  • 1. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models.
    Santoro M; Galkin S; Teredesai M; Nicolay OF; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jul; 124(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 12867904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
    Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
    Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study.
    Schirmer UR; Wiltshire WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 9423701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models.
    Watanabe-Kanno GA; Abrão J; Miasiro Junior H; Sánchez-Ayala A; Lagravère MO
    Braz Oral Res; 2009; 23(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 19893964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity.
    Bootvong K; Liu Z; McGrath C; Hägg U; Wong RW; Bendeus M; Yeung S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Oct; 32(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 20164126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of measurements on digital study models and plaster models.
    Reuschl RP; Heuer W; Stiesch M; Wenzel D; Dittmer MP
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 25724574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and validity of space analysis and irregularity index measurements using digital models.
    Goonewardene RW; Goonewardene MS; Razza JM; Murray K
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 19113071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases.
    Im J; Cha JY; Lee KJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):434-42. PubMed ID: 24703281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they?
    Abizadeh N; Moles DR; O'Neill J; Noar JH
    J Orthod; 2012 Sep; 39(3):151-9. PubMed ID: 22984099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models.
    Zilberman O; Huggare JA; Parikakis KA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 12828439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
    Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of linear measurements and analyses taken from plaster models and three-dimensional images.
    Porto BG; Porto TS; Silva MB; Grehs RA; Pinto Ados S; Bhandi SH; Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; dos Santos-Pinto LA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 25825090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis.
    Koretsi V; Tingelhoff L; Proff P; Kirschneck C
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28531341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios.
    Naidu D; Freer TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):304-10. PubMed ID: 23910212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques.
    Hazeveld A; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 24373661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.
    Fleming PS; Marinho V; Johal A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Feb; 14(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21205164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
    Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.