These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12867908)

  • 1. Induction of labor: the misoprostol controversy.
    Goldberg AB; Wing DA
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2003; 48(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 12867908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD000941. PubMed ID: 12535398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review.
    Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N; Gupta A; Kriplani A; Bhatla N; Parul
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
    Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL; Comino-Delgado R; Garcia-Benasach F; Martinez-Del-Fresno P; Moreno-Corral LJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
    Mbaluka CM; Kamau K; Karanja JG; Mugo N
    East Afr Med J; 2014 Sep; 91(9):303-10. PubMed ID: 26866082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.