151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12867939)
1. Don't believe the hype.
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6946):237. PubMed ID: 12867939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Damned if they do, damned if they don't..
Giles J
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):656-7. PubMed ID: 14562072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Time to choose.
Aldhous P
Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):655. PubMed ID: 14562071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fears over Europe's GM crop plan.
Chipman A
Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7306):542-3. PubMed ID: 20671684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nanotechnology: A little knowledge..
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6946):246-8. PubMed ID: 12867950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A fruitless campaign.
Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7221):421-2. PubMed ID: 19037266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Plant biotechnology: Tarnished promise.
Nature; 2013 May; 497(7447):21. PubMed ID: 23636376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US and biologists wary of strict biotech rules.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):6. PubMed ID: 14999250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: introduction to nanotechnology: potential applications in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Agoramoorthy G; Chakraborty C
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 86(12):1031-2; author reply 1032. PubMed ID: 18090446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Small steps.
Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7413):557. PubMed ID: 22932340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):807. PubMed ID: 15829921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Activists should accept mainstream view of GM.
Dennis DT
Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7042):561. PubMed ID: 15931192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. What drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?
Currall SC; King EB; Lane N; Madera J; Turner S
Nat Nanotechnol; 2006 Dec; 1(3):153-5. PubMed ID: 18654170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transparent communication strategy on GMOs: will it change public opinion?
Sinemus K; Egelhofer M
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1141-6. PubMed ID: 17703492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The difficulty of structuring and focusing the co-existence debate in Europe.
Custers R
Biotechnol J; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1086-7. PubMed ID: 17703493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nanotechnology and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Marlowe DE
Stand News; 2005 Jul; 33(7):29-31. PubMed ID: 16237872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biotech crop rules get rewrite.
Marris E
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7158):9. PubMed ID: 17805261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods. European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Concluding remarks.
Kuiper HA; König A; Kleter GA; Hammes WP; Knudsen I;
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1195-202. PubMed ID: 15123387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nutritional and safety assessment of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology--case studies by the International Food Biotechnology Committee of ILSI.
Glenn KC
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():229-32. PubMed ID: 18296343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In risk assessment, one has to admit ignorance.
Hoffmann-Riem H; Wynne B
Nature; 2002 Mar; 416(6877):123. PubMed ID: 11894070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
