These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12868333)

  • 1. [Registering event-related auditory potentials (P300) in patients with cochlear implants].
    Mühler R; Ziese M; von Specht H
    Z Med Phys; 2003; 13(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12868333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visualization of stimulation patterns in cochlear implants: application to event-related potentials (P300) in cochlear implant users.
    Mühler R; Ziese M; Kevanishvili Z; Schmidt M; von Specht H
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 15064663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of discrimination difficulty on cognitive event-related brain potentials in patients with cochlear implants.
    Okusa M; Shiraishi T; Kubo T; Nageishi Y
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Nov; 121(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10547481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of cochlear implant benefit with auditory cortical evoked potentials.
    Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):429-35. PubMed ID: 12403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Significance of auditory evoked responses (EABR and P300) in cochlear implant subjects.
    Kubo T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Matsukawa M; Doi K; Tamura M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):257-61. PubMed ID: 11349791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the event-related P300 potential in cochlear implant subjects for the study of strategy-dependent speech processing.
    Beynon AJ; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S44-7. PubMed ID: 15732382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients.
    Micco AG; Kraus N; Koch DB; McGee TJ; Carrell TD; Sharma A; Nicol T; Wiet RJ
    Am J Otol; 1995 Jul; 16(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 8588653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects.
    Cass M; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun; 46(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 9255431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toward Automated Cochlear Implant Fitting Procedures Based on Event-Related Potentials.
    Finke M; Billinger M; Büchner A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e118-e127. PubMed ID: 27787394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory event-related potentials in post- and prelingually deaf cochlear implant recipients.
    Jordan K; Schmidt A; Plotz K; von Specht H; Begall K; Roth N; Scheich H
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S116-7. PubMed ID: 9391625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of adaptive directional microphone on auditory evoked cortical P300 response and speech performance in cochlear implant users.
    Alnıaçık A; Akdaş F
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):861-868. PubMed ID: 31268365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P300 component of event-related potentials in passive tasks.
    Iwanami A; Kamijima K; Yoshizawa J
    Int J Neurosci; 1996 Feb; 84(1-4):121-6. PubMed ID: 8707473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The P300 auditory event-related potential as a method to assess the benefit of contralateral hearing aid use in bimodal listeners: a proof-of-concept.
    Van Yper LN; Dhooge IJM; Vermeire K; De Vel EFJ; Beynon AJ
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 31460806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects.
    Wable J; van den Abbeele T; Gallégo S; Frachet B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 111(4):743-51. PubMed ID: 10727926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants.
    Kileny PR; Boerst A; Zwolan T
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):161-9. PubMed ID: 9334760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination of speech sound contrasts determined with behavioral tests and event-related potentials in cochlear implant recipients.
    Beynon AJ; Snik AF; Stegeman DF; van den Broek P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 15715067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Literature overview on P3 measurement as an objective measure of auditory performance in post-lingually deaf adults with a cochlear implant.
    Jacquemin L; Mertens G; Schlee W; Van de Heyning P; Gilles A
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):816-823. PubMed ID: 31441664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality.
    Mertens R; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 104(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 9402891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.