68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12869401)
1. The detection of change in mammographic density.
Stone J; Gunasekara A; Martin LJ; Yaffe M; Minkin S; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Jul; 12(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 12869401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features.
Boyd N; Martin L; Stone J; Little L; Minkin S; Yaffe M
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Oct; 11(10 Pt 1):1048-53. PubMed ID: 12376506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of Computer-Assisted Breast Density Estimation: Comparison of Interactive Thresholding, Semiautomated, and Fully Automated Methods.
Kang E; Lee EJ; Jang M; Kim SM; Kim Y; Chun M; Tai JH; Han W; Kim SW; Kim JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 27187523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of mammographic breast density analysis: results of formal operator training.
Prevrhal S; Shepherd JA; Smith-Bindman R; Cummings SR; Kerlikowske K
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Nov; 11(11):1389-93. PubMed ID: 12433716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk.
Vachon CM; Pankratz VS; Scott CG; Maloney SD; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Milanese T; Carston MJ; Sellers TA
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 May; 16(5):921-8. PubMed ID: 17507617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for breast cancer associated with mammographic features in Singaporean chinese women.
Heng D; Gao F; Jong R; Fishell E; Yaffe M; Martin L; Li T; Stone J; Sun L; Hopper J; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Nov; 13(11 Pt 1):1751-8. PubMed ID: 15533903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate dietary intervention on change in mammographic density over menopause.
Martin LJ; Greenberg CV; Kriukov V; Minkin S; Jenkins DJ; Yaffe M; Hislop G; Boyd NF
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Jan; 113(1):163-72. PubMed ID: 18214671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic density using two computer-based methods in an isoflavone trial.
Kataoka M; Atkinson C; Warren R; Sala E; Day NE; Highnam R; Warsi I; Bingham SA
Maturitas; 2008 Apr; 59(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 18495387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the Nurses' Health Study.
Samimi G; Colditz GA; Baer HJ; Tamimi RM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 May; 109(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 17592770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproducibility of visual assessment on mammographic density.
Gao J; Warren R; Warren-Forward H; Forbes JF
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Mar; 108(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 17616811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding: application to longitudinal twin data on mammographic density measures that predict breast cancer risk.
Stone J; Dite GS; Giles GG; Cawson J; English DR; Hopper JL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1149-55. PubMed ID: 22539605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women.
Kotsuma Y; Tamaki Y; Nishimura T; Tsubai M; Ueda S; Shimazu K; Jin Kim S; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17716895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A mammographic image analysis method to detect and measure changes in breast density.
Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Highnam R; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 52(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 15544906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies.
Torres-Mejía G; De Stavola B; Allen DS; Pérez-Gavilán JJ; Ferreira JM; Fentiman IS; Dos Santos Silva I
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1052-9. PubMed ID: 15894652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.
Kegelmeyer WP; Pruneda JM; Bourland PD; Hillis A; Riggs MW; Nipper ML
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 8153302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plasma levels of leptin and mammographic density among postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study.
Stuedal A; Ursin G; Veierød MB; Bremnes Y; Reseland JE; Drevon CA; Gram IT
Breast Cancer Res; 2006; 8(5):R55. PubMed ID: 17010200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
