148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12869781)
1. Effective use of assisted reproduction.
Bhattacharya S
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 May; 6 Suppl 1():S60-2. PubMed ID: 12869781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
Okun N; Sierra S; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.
Pandian Z; Bhattacharya S; Nikolaou D; Vale L; Templeton A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (2):CD003357. PubMed ID: 12076476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?
Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Bensdorp AJ; Bossuyt PM; Koks C; Oosterhuis GJ; Hoek A; Hompes P; Broekmans FJ; Verhoeve HR; de Bruin JP; van Golde R; Repping S; Cohlen BJ; Lambers MD; van Bommel PF; Slappendel E; Perquin D; Smeenk J; Pelinck MJ; Gianotten J; Hoozemans DA; Maas JW; Groen H; Eijkemans MJ; van der Veen F; Mol BW; van Wely M
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2331-9. PubMed ID: 26269539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.
Chen H; Wang Y; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Tian H; Cai R; Hong Q; Chen Q; Shoham Z; Kuang Y
Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1194-1201.e2. PubMed ID: 25813280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary: controversies in reproductive medicine.
Kennedy R
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2003 May; 6 Suppl 1():S63-4. PubMed ID: 12869782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility.
Dodson WC; Haney AF
Fertil Steril; 1991 Mar; 55(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 2001748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.
van Rumste MM; Custers IM; van Wely M; Koks CA; van Weering HG; Beckers NG; Scheffer GJ; Broekmans FJ; Hompes PG; Mochtar MH; van der Veen F; Mol BW
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Mar; 28(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 24456703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can we identify subfertile couples that benefit from immediate in vitro fertilisation over intrauterine insemination?
Tjon-Kon-Fat RI; Tajik P; Custers IM; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F; van Wely M; Mol BW; Zafarmand MH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jul; 202():36-40. PubMed ID: 27156154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project.
Ombelet W; De Sutter P; Van der Elst J; Martens G
Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 15528214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection for couples with unexplained infertility after failed direct intraperitoneal insemination.
Takeuchi S; Minoura H; Shibahara T; Shen X; Futamura N; Toyoda N
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2000 Oct; 17(9):515-20. PubMed ID: 11155325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra-uterine insemination for unexplained subfertility.
Veltman-Verhulst SM; Cohlen BJ; Hughes E; Heineman MJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD001838. PubMed ID: 22972053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Infertility: a health problem in the Muslim world.
Serour GI; El Ghar M; Mansour RT
Popul Sci; 1991 Jan; 10():41-58. PubMed ID: 12284661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effectiveness of IVF in unexplained infertility: a systematic Cochrane review. 2002,
Pandian Z; Bhattacharya S; Nikolaou D; Vale L; Templeton A
Hum Reprod; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2001-7. PubMed ID: 14507813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility.
Guzick DS; Sullivan MW; Adamson GD; Cedars MI; Falk RJ; Peterson EP; Steinkampf MP
Fertil Steril; 1998 Aug; 70(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 9696208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.
Pandian Z; Bhattacharya S; Ozturk O; Serour GI; Templeton A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004 Oct; (4):CD003416. PubMed ID: 15495053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.
Shih W; Rushford DD; Bourne H; Garrett C; McBain JC; Healy DL; Baker HW
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1644-53. PubMed ID: 18442997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies at the Nairobi In Vitro Fertilisation Centre.
Noreh LJ; Tucs O; Sekadde-Kigondu CB; Noreh JA
East Afr Med J; 2009 Apr; 86(4):156-61. PubMed ID: 20084998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction.
Jiang Z; Wang Y; Lin J; Xu J; Ding G; Huang H
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Oct; 44():90-104. PubMed ID: 28844405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility in advanced maternal age.
Tannus S; Son WY; Gilman A; Younes G; Shavit T; Dahan MH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Jan; 32(1):119-124. PubMed ID: 27852688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
