These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12870501)
1. New reproductive technologies, ethics and gender: the legislative process in Brazil. Diniz D Dev World Bioeth; 2002 Dec; 2(2):144-58. PubMed ID: 12870501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New reproductive technologies, ethics and legislation in Brazil: a delayed debate. Guilhem D Bioethics; 2001 Jun; 15(3):218-30. PubMed ID: 11700676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Women's right to choose rationally: genetic information, embryo selection, and genetic manipulation. Chambers JE Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(4):418-28. PubMed ID: 14619374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Regulating dangerous futures: the German Embryo Protection Act of 1990--legislation in risk society. Augst C Soc Leg Stud; 2000 Jun; 9(2):205-26. PubMed ID: 14628759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Health protection and embryo protection from an ethical-legal perspective. Report of the Bioethics Committee of Rheinland-Pfalz on the need to revise the embryo protection and stem cell laws]. Kress H Ethik Med; 2006 Mar; 18(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 17153256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The progressive legal vulnerability of embryonic human life in Spain: the law 35/1988 to 14/2006 and law 14/2007]. Germán Zurriaráin R Cuad Bioet; 2009; 20(69):155-81. PubMed ID: 19507920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Teaching feminist perspectives on health care ethics and law: a review essay. Bender L Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1993; 61(4):1251-76. PubMed ID: 11656277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to found a family. Douglas G; Hebenton B; Thomas T New Law J; 1992 Apr; 142(6548):537-8. PubMed ID: 16041881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A feminist challenge to practices of medicine. Wallace KA J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11644538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Law 25/2003, of 21 November, modifying Law 35/1988, of 22 November, concerning assisted reproduction techniques]. Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2003; (19):255-66. PubMed ID: 15032108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Invisible women in reproductive technologies: Critical reflections. Mitra P Indian J Med Ethics; 2018; 3(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 29724696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial reproductive technologies (ART) applications in Turkey as viewed by feminists. Sahinoglu-Pelin S Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2002; 8(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 11962525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology. Parks J Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Non-Medical Sex Selection and Saviour Sibling Selection in the Case of JS and LS v Patient Review Panel: Beyond the Welfare of the Child? Smith MK; Taylor-Sands M J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Mar; 15(1):139-153. PubMed ID: 29396799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hannah Arendt, feminist theorizing, and the debate over new reproductive technologies. Curtis KF Polity; 1995; 28(2):159-87. PubMed ID: 11655203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Canadian Assisted Human Reproduction Act: protecting women's health while potentially allowing human somatic cell nuclear transfer into non-human oocytes. Mykitiuk R; Nisker J; Bluhm R Am J Bioeth; 2007 Feb; 7(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 17366204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]